Commit 0b5e1c52 authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Ingo Molnar

printk: Release console_sem after logbuf_lock

Release console_sem after unlocking the logbuf_lock so that we don't
generate wakeups while holding logbuf_lock. This avoids some lock
inversion troubles once we remove the lockdep_off bits between
logbuf_lock and rq->lock (prints while holding rq->lock vs doing
wakeups while holding logbuf_lock).

There's of course still an actual deadlock where the printk()s under
rq->lock will issue a wakeup from the up() call, but lockdep won't
warn about that since semaphores are not tracked.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-j8swthl12u73h4znbvitljzd@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 59c5f46f
......@@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ static inline int can_use_console(unsigned int cpu)
static int console_trylock_for_printk(unsigned int cpu)
__releases(&logbuf_lock)
{
int retval = 0;
int retval = 0, wake = 0;
if (console_trylock()) {
retval = 1;
......@@ -795,12 +795,14 @@ static int console_trylock_for_printk(unsigned int cpu)
*/
if (!can_use_console(cpu)) {
console_locked = 0;
up(&console_sem);
wake = 1;
retval = 0;
}
}
printk_cpu = UINT_MAX;
spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
if (wake)
up(&console_sem);
return retval;
}
static const char recursion_bug_msg [] =
......@@ -1271,8 +1273,8 @@ void console_unlock(void)
if (unlikely(exclusive_console))
exclusive_console = NULL;
up(&console_sem);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&logbuf_lock, flags);
up(&console_sem);
if (wake_klogd)
wake_up_klogd();
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment