Commit 13463f73 authored by David S. Miller's avatar David S. Miller

Merge branch 'mptcp-mem-scheduling'

Mat Martineau says:

====================
mptcp: Updates for mem scheduling and SK_RECLAIM

In the "net: reduce tcp_memory_allocated inflation" series (merge commit
e10b02ee), Eric Dumazet noted that "Removal of SK_RECLAIM_CHUNK and
SK_RECLAIM_THRESHOLD is left to MPTCP maintainers as a follow up."

Patches 1-3 align MPTCP with the above TCP changes to forward memory
allocation, reclaim, and memory scheduling.

Patch 4 removes the SK_RECLAIM_* macros as Eric requested.
====================
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parents 456bfd9d e918c137
......@@ -1619,11 +1619,6 @@ static inline void sk_mem_charge(struct sock *sk, int size)
sk->sk_forward_alloc -= size;
}
/* the following macros control memory reclaiming in mptcp_rmem_uncharge()
*/
#define SK_RECLAIM_THRESHOLD (1 << 21)
#define SK_RECLAIM_CHUNK (1 << 20)
static inline void sk_mem_uncharge(struct sock *sk, int size)
{
if (!sk_has_account(sk))
......
......@@ -181,8 +181,8 @@ static void mptcp_rmem_uncharge(struct sock *sk, int size)
reclaimable = msk->rmem_fwd_alloc - sk_unused_reserved_mem(sk);
/* see sk_mem_uncharge() for the rationale behind the following schema */
if (unlikely(reclaimable >= SK_RECLAIM_THRESHOLD))
__mptcp_rmem_reclaim(sk, SK_RECLAIM_CHUNK);
if (unlikely(reclaimable >= PAGE_SIZE))
__mptcp_rmem_reclaim(sk, reclaimable);
}
static void mptcp_rfree(struct sk_buff *skb)
......@@ -323,20 +323,16 @@ static bool mptcp_rmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, int size)
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
int amt, amount;
if (size < msk->rmem_fwd_alloc)
if (size <= msk->rmem_fwd_alloc)
return true;
size -= msk->rmem_fwd_alloc;
amt = sk_mem_pages(size);
amount = amt << PAGE_SHIFT;
msk->rmem_fwd_alloc += amount;
if (!__sk_mem_raise_allocated(sk, size, amt, SK_MEM_RECV)) {
if (ssk->sk_forward_alloc < amount) {
msk->rmem_fwd_alloc -= amount;
if (!__sk_mem_raise_allocated(sk, size, amt, SK_MEM_RECV))
return false;
}
ssk->sk_forward_alloc -= amount;
}
msk->rmem_fwd_alloc += amount;
return true;
}
......@@ -966,25 +962,6 @@ static bool mptcp_frag_can_collapse_to(const struct mptcp_sock *msk,
df->data_seq + df->data_len == msk->write_seq;
}
static void __mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(struct sock *sk)
{
int reclaimable = mptcp_sk(sk)->rmem_fwd_alloc - sk_unused_reserved_mem(sk);
lockdep_assert_held_once(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
if (reclaimable > (int)PAGE_SIZE)
__mptcp_rmem_reclaim(sk, reclaimable - 1);
sk_mem_reclaim(sk);
}
static void mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(struct sock *sk)
{
mptcp_data_lock(sk);
__mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(sk);
mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
}
static void dfrag_uncharge(struct sock *sk, int len)
{
sk_mem_uncharge(sk, len);
......@@ -1004,7 +981,6 @@ static void __mptcp_clean_una(struct sock *sk)
{
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
struct mptcp_data_frag *dtmp, *dfrag;
bool cleaned = false;
u64 snd_una;
/* on fallback we just need to ignore snd_una, as this is really
......@@ -1027,7 +1003,6 @@ static void __mptcp_clean_una(struct sock *sk)
}
dfrag_clear(sk, dfrag);
cleaned = true;
}
dfrag = mptcp_rtx_head(sk);
......@@ -1049,7 +1024,6 @@ static void __mptcp_clean_una(struct sock *sk)
dfrag->already_sent -= delta;
dfrag_uncharge(sk, delta);
cleaned = true;
}
/* all retransmitted data acked, recovery completed */
......@@ -1057,9 +1031,6 @@ static void __mptcp_clean_una(struct sock *sk)
msk->recovery = false;
out:
if (cleaned && tcp_under_memory_pressure(sk))
__mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(sk);
if (snd_una == READ_ONCE(msk->snd_nxt) &&
snd_una == READ_ONCE(msk->write_seq)) {
if (mptcp_timer_pending(sk) && !mptcp_data_fin_enabled(msk))
......@@ -1211,12 +1182,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *mptcp_alloc_tx_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, boo
{
gfp_t gfp = data_lock_held ? GFP_ATOMIC : sk->sk_allocation;
if (unlikely(tcp_under_memory_pressure(sk))) {
if (data_lock_held)
__mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(sk);
else
mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(sk);
}
return __mptcp_alloc_tx_skb(sk, ssk, gfp);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment