Commit 18a5348d authored by Andy Lutomirski's avatar Andy Lutomirski Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/core: Idle_task_exit() shouldn't use switch_mm_irqs_off()

commit 252d2a41 upstream.

idle_task_exit() can be called with IRQs on x86 on and therefore
should use switch_mm(), not switch_mm_irqs_off().

This doesn't seem to cause any problems right now, but it will
confuse my upcoming TLB flush changes.  Nonetheless, I think it
should be backported because it's trivial.  There won't be any
meaningful performance impact because idle_task_exit() is only
used when offlining a CPU.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: f98db601 ("sched/core: Add switch_mm_irqs_off() and use it in the scheduler")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ca3d1a9fa93a0b49f5a8ff729eda3640fb6abdf9.1497034141.git.luto@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent c22d4b4d
...@@ -5206,7 +5206,7 @@ void idle_task_exit(void) ...@@ -5206,7 +5206,7 @@ void idle_task_exit(void)
BUG_ON(cpu_online(smp_processor_id())); BUG_ON(cpu_online(smp_processor_id()));
if (mm != &init_mm) { if (mm != &init_mm) {
switch_mm_irqs_off(mm, &init_mm, current); switch_mm(mm, &init_mm, current);
finish_arch_post_lock_switch(); finish_arch_post_lock_switch();
} }
mmdrop(mm); mmdrop(mm);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment