Commit 24516565 authored by Ming Lei's avatar Ming Lei Committed by Jens Axboe

blk-mq: fix NULL dereference on q->elevator in blk_mq_elv_switch_none

After grabbing q->sysfs_lock, q->elevator may become NULL because of
elevator switch.

Fix the NULL dereference on q->elevator by checking it with lock.
Reported-by: default avatarGuangwu Zhang <guazhang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMing Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230616132354.415109-1-ming.lei@redhat.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 84bd06c6
...@@ -4604,9 +4604,6 @@ static bool blk_mq_elv_switch_none(struct list_head *head, ...@@ -4604,9 +4604,6 @@ static bool blk_mq_elv_switch_none(struct list_head *head,
{ {
struct blk_mq_qe_pair *qe; struct blk_mq_qe_pair *qe;
if (!q->elevator)
return true;
qe = kmalloc(sizeof(*qe), GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY); qe = kmalloc(sizeof(*qe), GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY);
if (!qe) if (!qe)
return false; return false;
...@@ -4614,6 +4611,12 @@ static bool blk_mq_elv_switch_none(struct list_head *head, ...@@ -4614,6 +4611,12 @@ static bool blk_mq_elv_switch_none(struct list_head *head,
/* q->elevator needs protection from ->sysfs_lock */ /* q->elevator needs protection from ->sysfs_lock */
mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock); mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
/* the check has to be done with holding sysfs_lock */
if (!q->elevator) {
kfree(qe);
goto unlock;
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&qe->node); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&qe->node);
qe->q = q; qe->q = q;
qe->type = q->elevator->type; qe->type = q->elevator->type;
...@@ -4621,6 +4624,7 @@ static bool blk_mq_elv_switch_none(struct list_head *head, ...@@ -4621,6 +4624,7 @@ static bool blk_mq_elv_switch_none(struct list_head *head,
__elevator_get(qe->type); __elevator_get(qe->type);
list_add(&qe->node, head); list_add(&qe->node, head);
elevator_disable(q); elevator_disable(q);
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock); mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
return true; return true;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment