Commit 27ae357f authored by David Rientjes's avatar David Rientjes Committed by Linus Torvalds

mm, oom: fix concurrent munlock and oom reaper unmap, v3

Since exit_mmap() is done without the protection of mm->mmap_sem, it is
possible for the oom reaper to concurrently operate on an mm until
MMF_OOM_SKIP is set.

This allows munlock_vma_pages_all() to concurrently run while the oom
reaper is operating on a vma.  Since munlock_vma_pages_range() depends
on clearing VM_LOCKED from vm_flags before actually doing the munlock to
determine if any other vmas are locking the same memory, the check for
VM_LOCKED in the oom reaper is racy.

This is especially noticeable on architectures such as powerpc where
clearing a huge pmd requires serialize_against_pte_lookup().  If the pmd
is zapped by the oom reaper during follow_page_mask() after the check
for pmd_none() is bypassed, this ends up deferencing a NULL ptl or a
kernel oops.

Fix this by manually freeing all possible memory from the mm before
doing the munlock and then setting MMF_OOM_SKIP.  The oom reaper can not
run on the mm anymore so the munlock is safe to do in exit_mmap().  It
also matches the logic that the oom reaper currently uses for
determining when to set MMF_OOM_SKIP itself, so there's no new risk of
excessive oom killing.

This issue fixes CVE-2018-1000200.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1804241526320.238665@chino.kir.corp.google.com
Fixes: 21292580 ("mm: oom: let oom_reap_task and exit_mmap run concurrently")
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Suggested-by: default avatarTetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Acked-by: default avatarMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[4.14+]
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 013567be
......@@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ static inline int check_stable_address_space(struct mm_struct *mm)
return 0;
}
void __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm);
extern unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p,
struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const nodemask_t *nodemask,
unsigned long totalpages);
......
......@@ -3024,6 +3024,32 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
/* mm's last user has gone, and its about to be pulled down */
mmu_notifier_release(mm);
if (unlikely(mm_is_oom_victim(mm))) {
/*
* Manually reap the mm to free as much memory as possible.
* Then, as the oom reaper does, set MMF_OOM_SKIP to disregard
* this mm from further consideration. Taking mm->mmap_sem for
* write after setting MMF_OOM_SKIP will guarantee that the oom
* reaper will not run on this mm again after mmap_sem is
* dropped.
*
* Nothing can be holding mm->mmap_sem here and the above call
* to mmu_notifier_release(mm) ensures mmu notifier callbacks in
* __oom_reap_task_mm() will not block.
*
* This needs to be done before calling munlock_vma_pages_all(),
* which clears VM_LOCKED, otherwise the oom reaper cannot
* reliably test it.
*/
mutex_lock(&oom_lock);
__oom_reap_task_mm(mm);
mutex_unlock(&oom_lock);
set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
}
if (mm->locked_vm) {
vma = mm->mmap;
while (vma) {
......@@ -3045,24 +3071,6 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
/* update_hiwater_rss(mm) here? but nobody should be looking */
/* Use -1 here to ensure all VMAs in the mm are unmapped */
unmap_vmas(&tlb, vma, 0, -1);
if (unlikely(mm_is_oom_victim(mm))) {
/*
* Wait for oom_reap_task() to stop working on this
* mm. Because MMF_OOM_SKIP is already set before
* calling down_read(), oom_reap_task() will not run
* on this "mm" post up_write().
*
* mm_is_oom_victim() cannot be set from under us
* either because victim->mm is already set to NULL
* under task_lock before calling mmput and oom_mm is
* set not NULL by the OOM killer only if victim->mm
* is found not NULL while holding the task_lock.
*/
set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
}
free_pgtables(&tlb, vma, FIRST_USER_ADDRESS, USER_PGTABLES_CEILING);
tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, 0, -1);
......
......@@ -469,7 +469,6 @@ bool process_shares_mm(struct task_struct *p, struct mm_struct *mm)
return false;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
/*
* OOM Reaper kernel thread which tries to reap the memory used by the OOM
......@@ -480,16 +479,54 @@ static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(oom_reaper_wait);
static struct task_struct *oom_reaper_list;
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(oom_reaper_lock);
static bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
void __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
struct mmu_gather tlb;
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
/*
* Tell all users of get_user/copy_from_user etc... that the content
* is no longer stable. No barriers really needed because unmapping
* should imply barriers already and the reader would hit a page fault
* if it stumbled over a reaped memory.
*/
set_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE, &mm->flags);
for (vma = mm->mmap ; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
if (!can_madv_dontneed_vma(vma))
continue;
/*
* Only anonymous pages have a good chance to be dropped
* without additional steps which we cannot afford as we
* are OOM already.
*
* We do not even care about fs backed pages because all
* which are reclaimable have already been reclaimed and
* we do not want to block exit_mmap by keeping mm ref
* count elevated without a good reason.
*/
if (vma_is_anonymous(vma) || !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
const unsigned long start = vma->vm_start;
const unsigned long end = vma->vm_end;
struct mmu_gather tlb;
tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, start, end);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, start, end);
unmap_page_range(&tlb, vma, start, end, NULL);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, start, end);
tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, start, end);
}
}
}
static bool oom_reap_task_mm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
{
bool ret = true;
/*
* We have to make sure to not race with the victim exit path
* and cause premature new oom victim selection:
* __oom_reap_task_mm exit_mm
* oom_reap_task_mm exit_mm
* mmget_not_zero
* mmput
* atomic_dec_and_test
......@@ -534,39 +571,8 @@ static bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
trace_start_task_reaping(tsk->pid);
/*
* Tell all users of get_user/copy_from_user etc... that the content
* is no longer stable. No barriers really needed because unmapping
* should imply barriers already and the reader would hit a page fault
* if it stumbled over a reaped memory.
*/
set_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE, &mm->flags);
for (vma = mm->mmap ; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
if (!can_madv_dontneed_vma(vma))
continue;
/*
* Only anonymous pages have a good chance to be dropped
* without additional steps which we cannot afford as we
* are OOM already.
*
* We do not even care about fs backed pages because all
* which are reclaimable have already been reclaimed and
* we do not want to block exit_mmap by keeping mm ref
* count elevated without a good reason.
*/
if (vma_is_anonymous(vma) || !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
const unsigned long start = vma->vm_start;
const unsigned long end = vma->vm_end;
__oom_reap_task_mm(mm);
tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, start, end);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, start, end);
unmap_page_range(&tlb, vma, start, end, NULL);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, start, end);
tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, start, end);
}
}
pr_info("oom_reaper: reaped process %d (%s), now anon-rss:%lukB, file-rss:%lukB, shmem-rss:%lukB\n",
task_pid_nr(tsk), tsk->comm,
K(get_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES)),
......@@ -587,14 +593,13 @@ static void oom_reap_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
struct mm_struct *mm = tsk->signal->oom_mm;
/* Retry the down_read_trylock(mmap_sem) a few times */
while (attempts++ < MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES && !__oom_reap_task_mm(tsk, mm))
while (attempts++ < MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES && !oom_reap_task_mm(tsk, mm))
schedule_timeout_idle(HZ/10);
if (attempts <= MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES ||
test_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags))
goto done;
pr_info("oom_reaper: unable to reap pid:%d (%s)\n",
task_pid_nr(tsk), tsk->comm);
debug_show_all_locks();
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment