plca.c: fix obvious mistake in checking retval
Revert a wrong fix that was done during the review process. The intention was to substitute "if(ret < 0)" with "if(ret)". Unfortunately, the intended fix did not meet the code. Besides, after additional review, it was decided that "if(ret < 0)" was actually the right thing to do. Fixes: 8580e16c ("net/ethtool: add netlink interface for the PLCA RS") Signed-off-by: Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f2277af8951a51cfee2fb905af8d7a812b7beaf4.1673616357.git.piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment