locking/ww_mutex: Replace cpu_relax() with cond_resched() for tests

When busy-spinning on a ww_mutex_trylock(), we depend upon the other
thread advancing and releasing the lock. This can not happen on a single
CPU unless we relinquish it:

  [ ] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [kworker/0:1:18]
  ...
  [ ] Call Trace:
  [ ]  mutex_trylock()
  [ ]  test_mutex_work+0x31/0x56
  [ ]  process_one_work+0x1b4/0x2f9
  [ ]  worker_thread+0x1b0/0x27c
  [ ]  kthread+0xd1/0xd3
  [ ]  ret_from_fork+0x19/0x30
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: f2a5fec1 ("locking/ww_mutex: Begin kselftests for ww_mutex")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170228094011.2595-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static void test_mutex_work(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	if (mtx->flags & TEST_MTX_TRY) {
 		while (!ww_mutex_trylock(&mtx->mutex))
-			cpu_relax();
+			cond_resched();
 	} else {
 		ww_mutex_lock(&mtx->mutex, NULL);
 	}
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static int __test_mutex(unsigned int flags)
 				ret = -EINVAL;
 				break;
 			}
-			cpu_relax();
+			cond_resched();
 		} while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
 	} else {
 		ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&mtx.done, TIMEOUT);