Commit 2b67bccb authored by Kuninori Morimoto's avatar Kuninori Morimoto Committed by Geert Uytterhoeven

pinctrl: sh-pfc: modify PINMUX_IPSR_MSEL() macro order

The difference between PINMUX_IPSR_MSEL() and PINMUX_IPSR_MODSEL_DATA()
are FN_xxx order, and PINMUX_IPSR_MSEL() is used only from r8a7778.
Now it r8a7778 works correctly with PINMUX_IPSR_MODSEL_DATA() order.
This means we can merge PINMUX_IPSR_MSEL() and PINMUX_IPSR_MODSEL_DATA().

Current PFC driver is very difficult to read, because macro names are
using different length. Especially PINMUX_IPSR_MODSEL_DATA() is well
used macro

	PINMUX_IPSR_NOGP(ispr, ...)
	PINMUX_IPSR_DATA(ipsr, ...)
	PINMUX_IPSR_NOGM(ispr, ...)
	PINMUX_IPSR_NOFN(ipsr, ...)
	PINMUX_IPSR_MSEL(ipsr, ...)
	PINMUX_IPSR_MODSEL_DATA(ipsr, ...)

It can be readable if we can merge
PINMUX_IPSR_MSEL() and PINMUX_IPSR_MODSEL_DATA()

	PINMUX_IPSR_NOGP(ispr, ...)
	PINMUX_IPSR_DATA(ipsr, ...)
	PINMUX_IPSR_NOGM(ispr, ...)
	PINMUX_IPSR_NOFN(ipsr, ...)
	PINMUX_IPSR_MSEL(ipsr, ...)
Signed-off-by: default avatarKuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Acked-by: default avatarSimon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Acked-by: default avatarLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: default avatarLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
parent 4adeabd0
......@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ struct sh_pfc_soc_info {
#define PINMUX_IPSR_NOFN(ipsr, fn, ms) \
PINMUX_DATA(fn##_MARK, FN_##ipsr, FN_##ms)
#define PINMUX_IPSR_MSEL(ipsr, fn, ms) \
PINMUX_DATA(fn##_MARK, FN_##fn, FN_##ipsr, FN_##ms)
PINMUX_DATA(fn##_MARK, FN_##ms, FN_##ipsr, FN_##fn)
#define PINMUX_IPSR_MODSEL_DATA(ipsr, fn, ms) \
PINMUX_DATA(fn##_MARK, FN_##ms, FN_##ipsr, FN_##fn)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment