Commit 2d12d571 authored by Richard Guy Briggs's avatar Richard Guy Briggs Committed by Luis Henriques

audit: stop an old auditd being starved out by a new auditd

BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1633404

Nothing prevents a new auditd starting up and replacing a valid
audit_pid when an old auditd is still running, effectively starving out
the old auditd since audit_pid no longer points to the old valid
auditd.

If no message to auditd has been attempted since auditd died
unnaturally or got killed, audit_pid will still indicate it is alive.
There isn't an easy way to detect if an old auditd is still running on
the existing audit_pid other than attempting to send a message to see
if it fails.  An -ECONNREFUSED almost certainly means it disappeared
and can be replaced.  Other errors are not so straightforward and may
indicate transient problems that will resolve themselves and the old
auditd will recover.  Yet others will likely need manual intervention
for which a new auditd will not solve the problem.

Send a new message type (AUDIT_REPLACE) to the old auditd containing a
u32 with the PID of the new auditd.  If the audit replace message
succeeds (or doesn't fail with certainty), fail to register the new
auditd and return an error (-EEXIST).

This is expected to make the patch preventing an old auditd orphaning a
new auditd redundant.

V3: Switch audit message type from 1000 to 1300 block.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRichard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 133e1e5a)
Signed-off-by: default avatarJoseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com>
Acked-by: default avatarSeth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Acked-by: default avatarTim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLuis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
parent ddc4cce4
...@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ ...@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@
#define AUDIT_SECCOMP 1326 /* Secure Computing event */ #define AUDIT_SECCOMP 1326 /* Secure Computing event */
#define AUDIT_PROCTITLE 1327 /* Proctitle emit event */ #define AUDIT_PROCTITLE 1327 /* Proctitle emit event */
#define AUDIT_FEATURE_CHANGE 1328 /* audit log listing feature changes */ #define AUDIT_FEATURE_CHANGE 1328 /* audit log listing feature changes */
#define AUDIT_REPLACE 1329 /* Replace auditd if this packet unanswerd */
#define AUDIT_AVC 1400 /* SE Linux avc denial or grant */ #define AUDIT_AVC 1400 /* SE Linux avc denial or grant */
#define AUDIT_SELINUX_ERR 1401 /* Internal SE Linux Errors */ #define AUDIT_SELINUX_ERR 1401 /* Internal SE Linux Errors */
......
...@@ -810,6 +810,16 @@ static int audit_set_feature(struct sk_buff *skb) ...@@ -810,6 +810,16 @@ static int audit_set_feature(struct sk_buff *skb)
return 0; return 0;
} }
static int audit_replace(pid_t pid)
{
struct sk_buff *skb = audit_make_reply(0, 0, AUDIT_REPLACE, 0, 0,
&pid, sizeof(pid));
if (!skb)
return -ENOMEM;
return netlink_unicast(audit_sock, skb, audit_nlk_portid, 0);
}
static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh) static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
{ {
u32 seq; u32 seq;
...@@ -871,9 +881,13 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh) ...@@ -871,9 +881,13 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
} }
if (s.mask & AUDIT_STATUS_PID) { if (s.mask & AUDIT_STATUS_PID) {
int new_pid = s.pid; int new_pid = s.pid;
pid_t requesting_pid = task_tgid_vnr(current);
if ((!new_pid) && (task_tgid_vnr(current) != audit_pid)) if ((!new_pid) && (requesting_pid != audit_pid))
return -EACCES; return -EACCES;
if (audit_pid && new_pid &&
audit_replace(requesting_pid) != -ECONNREFUSED)
return -EEXIST;
if (audit_enabled != AUDIT_OFF) if (audit_enabled != AUDIT_OFF)
audit_log_config_change("audit_pid", new_pid, audit_pid, 1); audit_log_config_change("audit_pid", new_pid, audit_pid, 1);
audit_pid = new_pid; audit_pid = new_pid;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment