Commit 31679f38 authored by Andi Kleen's avatar Andi Kleen Committed by Andi Kleen

[PATCH] Simplify profile_pc on x86-64

Use knowledge about EFLAGS layout (bits 22:63 are always 0) to distingush
EFLAGS word and kernel address in the spin lock stack frame.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
parent 0cb91a22
......@@ -189,20 +189,15 @@ unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long pc = instruction_pointer(regs);
/* Assume the lock function has either no stack frame or only a single
word. This checks if the address on the stack looks like a kernel
text address.
There is a small window for false hits, but in that case the tick
is just accounted to the spinlock function.
Better would be to write these functions in assembler again
and check exactly. */
/* Assume the lock function has either no stack frame or a copy
of eflags from PUSHF
Eflags always has bits 22 and up cleared unlike kernel addresses. */
if (!user_mode(regs) && in_lock_functions(pc)) {
char *v = *(char **)regs->rsp;
if ((v >= _stext && v <= _etext) ||
(v >= _sinittext && v <= _einittext) ||
(v >= (char *)MODULES_VADDR && v <= (char *)MODULES_END))
return (unsigned long)v;
return ((unsigned long *)regs->rsp)[1];
unsigned long *sp = (unsigned long *)regs->rsp;
if (sp[0] >> 22)
return sp[0];
if (sp[1] >> 22)
return sp[1];
}
return pc;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment