Commit 3afb0723 authored by Maxime Ripard's avatar Maxime Ripard Committed by Stephen Boyd

clk: Take into account uncached clocks in clk_set_rate_range()

clk_set_rate_range() will use the last requested rate for the clock when
it calls into the driver set_rate hook.

However, if CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE is set on that clock, the last
requested rate might not be matching the current rate of the clock. In
such a case, let's read out the rate from the hardware and use that in
our set_rate instead.

Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: default avatarMaxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816112530.1837489-13-maxime@cerno.techTested-by: default avatarLinux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Tested-by: default avatarNaresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarStephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
parent 2e9cad1a
...@@ -2373,6 +2373,10 @@ static int clk_set_rate_range_nolock(struct clk *clk, ...@@ -2373,6 +2373,10 @@ static int clk_set_rate_range_nolock(struct clk *clk,
goto out; goto out;
} }
rate = clk->core->req_rate;
if (clk->core->flags & CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE)
rate = clk_core_get_rate_recalc(clk->core);
/* /*
* Since the boundaries have been changed, let's give the * Since the boundaries have been changed, let's give the
* opportunity to the provider to adjust the clock rate based on * opportunity to the provider to adjust the clock rate based on
...@@ -2390,7 +2394,7 @@ static int clk_set_rate_range_nolock(struct clk *clk, ...@@ -2390,7 +2394,7 @@ static int clk_set_rate_range_nolock(struct clk *clk,
* - the determine_rate() callback does not really check for * - the determine_rate() callback does not really check for
* this corner case when determining the rate * this corner case when determining the rate
*/ */
rate = clamp(clk->core->req_rate, min, max); rate = clamp(rate, min, max);
ret = clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, rate); ret = clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, rate);
if (ret) { if (ret) {
/* rollback the changes */ /* rollback the changes */
......
...@@ -375,9 +375,40 @@ static void clk_test_uncached_set_range(struct kunit *test) ...@@ -375,9 +375,40 @@ static void clk_test_uncached_set_range(struct kunit *test)
clk_put(clk); clk_put(clk);
} }
/*
* Test that for an uncached clock, clk_set_rate_range() will work
* properly if the rate has changed in hardware.
*
* In this case, it means that if the rate wasn't initially in the range
* we're trying to set, but got changed at some point into the range
* without the kernel knowing about it, its rate shouldn't be affected.
*/
static void clk_test_uncached_updated_rate_set_range(struct kunit *test)
{
struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv;
struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL);
unsigned long rate;
/* We change the rate behind the clock framework's back */
ctx->rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000;
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test,
clk_set_rate_range(clk,
DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1,
DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2),
0);
rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000);
clk_put(clk);
}
static struct kunit_case clk_uncached_test_cases[] = { static struct kunit_case clk_uncached_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_uncached_get_rate), KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_uncached_get_rate),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_uncached_set_range), KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_uncached_set_range),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_uncached_updated_rate_set_range),
{} {}
}; };
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment