Commit 3ba88c47 authored by Harald Welte's avatar Harald Welte Committed by David S. Miller

net: Extend Kernel GTP-U tunneling documentation

* clarify specification references for v0/v1
* add section "APN vs. Network device"
* add section "Local GTP-U entity and tunnel identification"
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndreas Schultz <aschultz@tpip.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHarald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent f6b3716d
The Linux kernel GTP tunneling module The Linux kernel GTP tunneling module
====================================================================== ======================================================================
Documentation by Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> Documentation by Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> and
Andreas Schultz <aschultz@tpip.net>
In 'drivers/net/gtp.c' you are finding a kernel-level implementation In 'drivers/net/gtp.c' you are finding a kernel-level implementation
of a GTP tunnel endpoint. of a GTP tunnel endpoint.
...@@ -91,9 +92,13 @@ http://git.osmocom.org/libgtpnl/ ...@@ -91,9 +92,13 @@ http://git.osmocom.org/libgtpnl/
== Protocol Versions == == Protocol Versions ==
There are two different versions of GTP-U: v0 and v1. Both are There are two different versions of GTP-U: v0 [GSM TS 09.60] and v1
implemented in the Kernel GTP module. Version 0 is a legacy version, [3GPP TS 29.281]. Both are implemented in the Kernel GTP module.
and deprecated from recent 3GPP specifications. Version 0 is a legacy version, and deprecated from recent 3GPP
specifications.
GTP-U uses UDP for transporting PDUs. The receiving UDP port is 2151
for GTPv1-U and 3386 for GTPv0-U.
There are three versions of GTP-C: v0, v1, and v2. As the kernel There are three versions of GTP-C: v0, v1, and v2. As the kernel
doesn't implement GTP-C, we don't have to worry about this. It's the doesn't implement GTP-C, we don't have to worry about this. It's the
...@@ -133,3 +138,93 @@ doe to a lack of user interest, it never got merged. ...@@ -133,3 +138,93 @@ doe to a lack of user interest, it never got merged.
In 2015, Andreas Schultz came to the rescue and fixed lots more bugs, In 2015, Andreas Schultz came to the rescue and fixed lots more bugs,
extended it with new features and finally pushed all of us to get it extended it with new features and finally pushed all of us to get it
mainline, where it was merged in 4.7.0. mainline, where it was merged in 4.7.0.
== Architectural Details ==
=== Local GTP-U entity and tunnel identification ===
GTP-U uses UDP for transporting PDU's. The receiving UDP port is 2152
for GTPv1-U and 3386 for GTPv0-U.
There is only one GTP-U entity (and therefor SGSN/GGSN/S-GW/PDN-GW
instance) per IP address. Tunnel Endpoint Identifier (TEID) are unique
per GTP-U entity.
A specific tunnel is only defined by the destination entity. Since the
destination port is constant, only the destination IP and TEID define
a tunnel. The source IP and Port have no meaning for the tunnel.
Therefore:
* when sending, the remote entity is defined by the remote IP and
the tunnel endpoint id. The source IP and port have no meaning and
can be changed at any time.
* when receiving the local entity is defined by the local
destination IP and the tunnel endpoint id. The source IP and port
have no meaning and can change at any time.
[3GPP TS 29.281] Section 4.3.0 defines this so:
> The TEID in the GTP-U header is used to de-multiplex traffic
> incoming from remote tunnel endpoints so that it is delivered to the
> User plane entities in a way that allows multiplexing of different
> users, different packet protocols and different QoS levels.
> Therefore no two remote GTP-U endpoints shall send traffic to a
> GTP-U protocol entity using the same TEID value except
> for data forwarding as part of mobility procedures.
The definition above only defines that two remote GTP-U endpoints
*should not* send to the same TEID, it *does not* forbid or exclude
such a scenario. In fact, the mentioned mobility procedures make it
necessary that the GTP-U entity accepts traffic for TEIDs from
multiple or unknown peers.
Therefore, the receiving side identifies tunnels exclusively based on
TEIDs, not based on the source IP!
== APN vs. Network Device ==
The GTP-U driver creates a Linux network device for each Gi/SGi
interface.
[3GPP TS 29.281] calls the Gi/SGi reference point an interface. This
may lead to the impression that the GGSN/P-GW can have only one such
interface.
Correct is that the Gi/SGi reference point defines the interworking
between +the 3GPP packet domain (PDN) based on GTP-U tunnel and IP
based networks.
There is no provision in any of the 3GPP documents that limits the
number of Gi/SGi interfaces implemented by a GGSN/P-GW.
[3GPP TS 29.061] Section 11.3 makes it clear that the selection of a
specific Gi/SGi interfaces is made through the Access Point Name
(APN):
> 2. each private network manages its own addressing. In general this
> will result in different private networks having overlapping
> address ranges. A logically separate connection (e.g. an IP in IP
> tunnel or layer 2 virtual circuit) is used between the GGSN/P-GW
> and each private network.
>
> In this case the IP address alone is not necessarily unique. The
> pair of values, Access Point Name (APN) and IPv4 address and/or
> IPv6 prefixes, is unique.
In order to support the overlapping address range use case, each APN
is mapped to a separate Gi/SGi interface (network device).
NOTE: The Access Point Name is purely a control plane (GTP-C) concept.
At the GTP-U level, only Tunnel Endpoint Identifiers are present in
GTP-U packets and network devices are known
Therefore for a given UE the mapping in IP to PDN network is:
* network device + MS IP -> Peer IP + Peer TEID,
and from PDN to IP network:
* local GTP-U IP + TEID -> network device
Furthermore, before a received T-PDU is injected into the network
device the MS IP is checked against the IP recorded in PDP context.
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment