Commit 40196672 authored by Eric Dumazet's avatar Eric Dumazet Committed by Luis Henriques

net: clear sk_err_soft in sk_clone_lock()

BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1643637

[ Upstream commit e551c32d ]

At accept() time, it is possible the parent has a non zero
sk_err_soft, leftover from a prior error.

Make sure we do not leave this value in the child, as it
makes future getsockopt(SO_ERROR) calls quite unreliable.
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: default avatarSoheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLuis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
parent ac0068a3
...@@ -1562,6 +1562,7 @@ struct sock *sk_clone_lock(const struct sock *sk, const gfp_t priority) ...@@ -1562,6 +1562,7 @@ struct sock *sk_clone_lock(const struct sock *sk, const gfp_t priority)
} }
newsk->sk_err = 0; newsk->sk_err = 0;
newsk->sk_err_soft = 0;
newsk->sk_priority = 0; newsk->sk_priority = 0;
newsk->sk_incoming_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); newsk->sk_incoming_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
atomic64_set(&newsk->sk_cookie, 0); atomic64_set(&newsk->sk_cookie, 0);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment