Commit 41f71e5e authored by Stefan Popa's avatar Stefan Popa Committed by Jonathan Cameron

staging: iio: adc: ad7606: Use find_closest() macro

When looking for the available scale or oversampling ratio, it is better
to use the find_closest() macro. This simplifies the code and also does
not require an exact value to be entered from the user space.
Signed-off-by: default avatarStefan Popa <stefan.popa@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
parent c0683bfd
......@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/util_macros.h>
#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
#include <linux/iio/sysfs.h>
......@@ -30,8 +31,12 @@
* Scales are computed as 5000/32768 and 10000/32768 respectively,
* so that when applied to the raw values they provide mV values
*/
static const unsigned int scale_avail[2][2] = {
{0, 152588}, {0, 305176}
static const unsigned int scale_avail[2] = {
152588, 305176
};
static const unsigned int ad7606_oversampling_avail[7] = {
1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64,
};
static int ad7606_reset(struct ad7606_state *st)
......@@ -160,8 +165,8 @@ static int ad7606_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
*val = (short)ret;
return IIO_VAL_INT;
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
*val = scale_avail[st->range][0];
*val2 = scale_avail[st->range][1];
*val = 0;
*val2 = scale_avail[st->range];
return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO:
*val = st->oversampling;
......@@ -177,8 +182,8 @@ static ssize_t in_voltage_scale_available_show(struct device *dev,
int i, len = 0;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(scale_avail); i++)
len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%d.%06u ",
scale_avail[i][0], scale_avail[i][1]);
len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "0.%06u ",
scale_avail[i]);
buf[len - 1] = '\n';
......@@ -187,18 +192,6 @@ static ssize_t in_voltage_scale_available_show(struct device *dev,
static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR_RO(in_voltage_scale_available, 0);
static int ad7606_oversampling_get_index(unsigned int val)
{
unsigned char supported[] = {1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64};
int i;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(supported); i++)
if (val == supported[i])
return i;
return -EINVAL;
}
static int ad7606_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
int val,
......@@ -207,36 +200,29 @@ static int ad7606_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
{
struct ad7606_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
DECLARE_BITMAP(values, 3);
int ret, i;
int i;
switch (mask) {
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
ret = -EINVAL;
mutex_lock(&st->lock);
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(scale_avail); i++)
if (val2 == scale_avail[i][1]) {
i = find_closest(val2, scale_avail, ARRAY_SIZE(scale_avail));
gpiod_set_value(st->gpio_range, i);
st->range = i;
ret = 0;
break;
}
mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
return ret;
return 0;
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO:
if (val2)
return -EINVAL;
ret = ad7606_oversampling_get_index(val);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
i = find_closest(val, ad7606_oversampling_avail,
ARRAY_SIZE(ad7606_oversampling_avail));
values[0] = ret;
values[0] = i;
mutex_lock(&st->lock);
gpiod_set_array_value(3, st->gpio_os->desc, st->gpio_os->info,
values);
st->oversampling = val;
gpiod_set_array_value(ARRAY_SIZE(values), st->gpio_os->desc,
st->gpio_os->info, values);
st->oversampling = ad7606_oversampling_avail[i];
mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment