lib/vsprintf: Fix %pfwf when current node refcount == 0
A refcount issue can appeared in __fwnode_link_del() due to the pr_debug() call: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 901 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xe5/0x110 Call Trace: <TASK> ... of_node_get+0x1e/0x30 of_fwnode_get+0x28/0x40 fwnode_full_name_string+0x34/0x90 fwnode_string+0xdb/0x140 ... vsnprintf+0x17b/0x630 ... __fwnode_link_del+0x25/0xa0 fwnode_links_purge+0x39/0xb0 of_node_release+0xd9/0x180 ... Indeed, an fwnode (of_node) is being destroyed and so, of_node_release() is called because the of_node refcount reached 0. From of_node_release() several function calls are done and lead to a pr_debug() calls with %pfwf to print the fwnode full name. The issue is not present if we change %pfwf to %pfwP. To print the full name, %pfwf iterates over the current node and its parents and obtain/drop a reference to all nodes involved. In order to allow to print the full name (%pfwf) of a node while it is being destroyed, do not obtain/drop a reference to this current node. Fixes: a92eb762 ("lib/vsprintf: Make use of fwnode API to obtain node names and separators") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231114152655.409331-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment