crypto: arm64/sha512-ce - clean up backwards function names

In the Linux kernel, a function whose name has two leading underscores
is conventionally called by the same-named function without leading
underscores -- not the other way around.  __sha512_ce_transform() and
__sha512_block_data_order() got this backwards.  Fix this, albeit
without changing "sha512_block_data_order" in the perlasm since that is
OpenSSL code.  No change in behavior.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

arch/arm64/crypto/sha512-ce-core.S

@@ -102,11 +102,11 @@
 	.endm
 
 	/*
-	 * void sha512_ce_transform(struct sha512_state *sst, u8 const *src,
+	 * int __sha512_ce_transform(struct sha512_state *sst, u8 const *src,
 	 *			     int blocks)
 	 */
 	.text
-SYM_FUNC_START(sha512_ce_transform)
+SYM_FUNC_START(__sha512_ce_transform)
 	/* load state */
 	ld1		{v8.2d-v11.2d}, [x0]
 
@@ -203,4 +203,4 @@ CPU_LE(	rev64		v19.16b, v19.16b	)
 3:	st1		{v8.2d-v11.2d}, [x0]
 	mov		w0, w2
 	ret
-SYM_FUNC_END(sha512_ce_transform)
+SYM_FUNC_END(__sha512_ce_transform)

arch/arm64/crypto/sha512-ce-glue.c

@@ -26,26 +26,26 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
 MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO("sha384");
 MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO("sha512");
 
-asmlinkage int sha512_ce_transform(struct sha512_state *sst, u8 const *src,
+asmlinkage int __sha512_ce_transform(struct sha512_state *sst, u8 const *src,
 				     int blocks);
 
 asmlinkage void sha512_block_data_order(u64 *digest, u8 const *src, int blocks);
 
-static void __sha512_ce_transform(struct sha512_state *sst, u8 const *src,
+static void sha512_ce_transform(struct sha512_state *sst, u8 const *src,
 				int blocks)
 {
 	while (blocks) {
 		int rem;
 
 		kernel_neon_begin();
-		rem = sha512_ce_transform(sst, src, blocks);
+		rem = __sha512_ce_transform(sst, src, blocks);
 		kernel_neon_end();
 		src += (blocks - rem) * SHA512_BLOCK_SIZE;
 		blocks = rem;
 	}
 }
 
-static void __sha512_block_data_order(struct sha512_state *sst, u8 const *src,
+static void sha512_arm64_transform(struct sha512_state *sst, u8 const *src,
 				   int blocks)
 {
 	sha512_block_data_order(sst->state, src, blocks);
@@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ static void __sha512_block_data_order(struct sha512_state *sst, u8 const *src,
 static int sha512_ce_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
 			    unsigned int len)
 {
-	sha512_block_fn *fn = crypto_simd_usable() ? __sha512_ce_transform
-						   : __sha512_block_data_order;
+	sha512_block_fn *fn = crypto_simd_usable() ? sha512_ce_transform
+						   : sha512_arm64_transform;
 
 	sha512_base_do_update(desc, data, len, fn);
 	return 0;
@@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ static int sha512_ce_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
 static int sha512_ce_finup(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
 			   unsigned int len, u8 *out)
 {
-	sha512_block_fn *fn = crypto_simd_usable() ? __sha512_ce_transform
-						   : __sha512_block_data_order;
+	sha512_block_fn *fn = crypto_simd_usable() ? sha512_ce_transform
+						   : sha512_arm64_transform;
 
 	sha512_base_do_update(desc, data, len, fn);
 	sha512_base_do_finalize(desc, fn);
@@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ static int sha512_ce_finup(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
 
 static int sha512_ce_final(struct shash_desc *desc, u8 *out)
 {
-	sha512_block_fn *fn = crypto_simd_usable() ? __sha512_ce_transform
-						   : __sha512_block_data_order;
+	sha512_block_fn *fn = crypto_simd_usable() ? sha512_ce_transform
+						   : sha512_arm64_transform;
 
 	sha512_base_do_finalize(desc, fn);
 	return sha512_base_finish(desc, out);