Commit 612e0486 authored by Potnuri Bharat Teja's avatar Potnuri Bharat Teja Committed by Doug Ledford

iw_cxgb4: fix ECN check on the passive accept

pass_accept_req() is using the same skb for handling accept request and
sending accept reply to HW. Here req and rpl structures are pointing to
same skb->data which is over written by INIT_TP_WR() and leads to
accessing corrupt req fields in accept_cr() while checking for ECN flags.
Reordered code in accept_cr() to fetch correct req fields.

Fixes: 92e7ae71 ("iw_cxgb4: Choose appropriate hw mtu index and ISS for iWARP connections")
Signed-off-by: default avatarPotnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@chelsio.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191003104353.11590-1-bharat@chelsio.comSigned-off-by: default avatarDoug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
parent 22bb1365
......@@ -2424,20 +2424,6 @@ static int accept_cr(struct c4iw_ep *ep, struct sk_buff *skb,
enum chip_type adapter_type = ep->com.dev->rdev.lldi.adapter_type;
pr_debug("ep %p tid %u\n", ep, ep->hwtid);
skb_get(skb);
rpl = cplhdr(skb);
if (!is_t4(adapter_type)) {
skb_trim(skb, roundup(sizeof(*rpl5), 16));
rpl5 = (void *)rpl;
INIT_TP_WR(rpl5, ep->hwtid);
} else {
skb_trim(skb, sizeof(*rpl));
INIT_TP_WR(rpl, ep->hwtid);
}
OPCODE_TID(rpl) = cpu_to_be32(MK_OPCODE_TID(CPL_PASS_ACCEPT_RPL,
ep->hwtid));
cxgb_best_mtu(ep->com.dev->rdev.lldi.mtus, ep->mtu, &mtu_idx,
enable_tcp_timestamps && req->tcpopt.tstamp,
(ep->com.remote_addr.ss_family == AF_INET) ? 0 : 1);
......@@ -2483,6 +2469,20 @@ static int accept_cr(struct c4iw_ep *ep, struct sk_buff *skb,
if (tcph->ece && tcph->cwr)
opt2 |= CCTRL_ECN_V(1);
}
skb_get(skb);
rpl = cplhdr(skb);
if (!is_t4(adapter_type)) {
skb_trim(skb, roundup(sizeof(*rpl5), 16));
rpl5 = (void *)rpl;
INIT_TP_WR(rpl5, ep->hwtid);
} else {
skb_trim(skb, sizeof(*rpl));
INIT_TP_WR(rpl, ep->hwtid);
}
OPCODE_TID(rpl) = cpu_to_be32(MK_OPCODE_TID(CPL_PASS_ACCEPT_RPL,
ep->hwtid));
if (CHELSIO_CHIP_VERSION(adapter_type) > CHELSIO_T4) {
u32 isn = (prandom_u32() & ~7UL) - 1;
opt2 |= T5_OPT_2_VALID_F;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment