Commit 65f67a3e authored by Baolin Wang's avatar Baolin Wang Committed by Andrew Morton

mm/page_alloc: add some comments to explain the possible hole in __pageblock_pfn_to_page()

Now the __pageblock_pfn_to_page() is used by set_zone_contiguous(), which
checks whether the given zone contains holes, and uses
pfn_to_online_page() to validate if the start pfn is online and valid, as
well as using pfn_valid() to validate the end pfn.

However, the __pageblock_pfn_to_page() function may return non-NULL even
if the end pfn of a pageblock is in a memory hole in some situations.  For
example, if the pageblock order is MAX_ORDER, which will fall into 2
sub-sections, and the end pfn of the pageblock may be hole even though the
start pfn is online and valid.

See below memory layout as an example and suppose the pageblock order is
MAX_ORDER.

[    0.000000] Zone ranges:
[    0.000000]   DMA      [mem 0x0000000040000000-0x00000000ffffffff]
[    0.000000]   DMA32    empty
[    0.000000]   Normal   [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x0000001fa7ffffff]
[    0.000000] Movable zone start for each node
[    0.000000] Early memory node ranges
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000000040000000-0x0000001fa3c7ffff]
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa3c80000-0x0000001fa3ffffff]
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa4000000-0x0000001fa402ffff]
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa4030000-0x0000001fa40effff]
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa40f0000-0x0000001fa73cffff]
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa73d0000-0x0000001fa745ffff]
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa7460000-0x0000001fa746ffff]
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa7470000-0x0000001fa758ffff]
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa7590000-0x0000001fa7dfffff]

Focus on the last memory range, and there is a hole for the range [mem
0x0000001fa7590000-0x0000001fa7dfffff].  That means the last pageblock
will contain the range from 0x1fa7c00000 to 0x1fa7ffffff, since the
pageblock must be 4M aligned.  And in this pageblock, these pfns will fall
into 2 sub-section (the sub-section size is 2M aligned).

So, the 1st sub-section (indicates pfn range: 0x1fa7c00000 - 0x1fa7dfffff
) in this pageblock is valid by calling subsection_map_init() in
free_area_init(), but the 2nd sub-section (indicates pfn range:
0x1fa7e00000 - 0x1fa7ffffff ) in this pageblock is not valid.

This did not break anything until now, but the zone continuous is fragile
in this possible scenario.  So as previous discussion[1], it is better to
add some comments to explain this possible issue in case there are some
future pfn walkers that rely on this.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/87r0sdsmr6.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com/

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5c26368865e79c743a453dea48d30670b19d2e4f.1682425534.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5c26368865e79c743a453dea48d30670b19d2e4f.1682425534.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: default avatarBaolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatar"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
parent 2c281f54
...@@ -1502,6 +1502,15 @@ void __free_pages_core(struct page *page, unsigned int order) ...@@ -1502,6 +1502,15 @@ void __free_pages_core(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
* interleaving within a single pageblock. It is therefore sufficient to check * interleaving within a single pageblock. It is therefore sufficient to check
* the first and last page of a pageblock and avoid checking each individual * the first and last page of a pageblock and avoid checking each individual
* page in a pageblock. * page in a pageblock.
*
* Note: the function may return non-NULL struct page even for a page block
* which contains a memory hole (i.e. there is no physical memory for a subset
* of the pfn range). For example, if the pageblock order is MAX_ORDER, which
* will fall into 2 sub-sections, and the end pfn of the pageblock may be hole
* even though the start pfn is online and valid. This should be safe most of
* the time because struct pages are still initialized via init_unavailable_range()
* and pfn walkers shouldn't touch any physical memory range for which they do
* not recognize any specific metadata in struct pages.
*/ */
struct page *__pageblock_pfn_to_page(unsigned long start_pfn, struct page *__pageblock_pfn_to_page(unsigned long start_pfn,
unsigned long end_pfn, struct zone *zone) unsigned long end_pfn, struct zone *zone)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment