Commit 69c388d2 authored by Nadav Amit's avatar Nadav Amit Committed by Kleber Sacilotto de Souza

VMCI: Release resource if the work is already queued

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845036

commit ba03a9bb upstream.

Francois reported that VMware balloon gets stuck after a balloon reset,
when the VMCI doorbell is removed. A similar error can occur when the
balloon driver is removed with the following splat:

[ 1088.622000] INFO: task modprobe:3565 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[ 1088.622035]       Tainted: G        W         5.2.0 #4
[ 1088.622087] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[ 1088.622205] modprobe        D    0  3565   1450 0x00000000
[ 1088.622210] Call Trace:
[ 1088.622246]  __schedule+0x2a8/0x690
[ 1088.622248]  schedule+0x2d/0x90
[ 1088.622250]  schedule_timeout+0x1d3/0x2f0
[ 1088.622252]  wait_for_completion+0xba/0x140
[ 1088.622320]  ? wake_up_q+0x80/0x80
[ 1088.622370]  vmci_resource_remove+0xb9/0xc0 [vmw_vmci]
[ 1088.622373]  vmci_doorbell_destroy+0x9e/0xd0 [vmw_vmci]
[ 1088.622379]  vmballoon_vmci_cleanup+0x6e/0xf0 [vmw_balloon]
[ 1088.622381]  vmballoon_exit+0x18/0xcc8 [vmw_balloon]
[ 1088.622394]  __x64_sys_delete_module+0x146/0x280
[ 1088.622408]  do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x130
[ 1088.622410]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ 1088.622415] RIP: 0033:0x7f54f62791b7
[ 1088.622421] Code: Bad RIP value.
[ 1088.622421] RSP: 002b:00007fff2a949008 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
[ 1088.622426] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055dff8b55d00 RCX: 00007f54f62791b7
[ 1088.622426] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 000055dff8b55d68
[ 1088.622427] RBP: 000055dff8b55d00 R08: 00007fff2a947fb1 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 1088.622427] R10: 00007f54f62f5cc0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000055dff8b55d68
[ 1088.622428] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 000055dff8b55d68 R15: 00007fff2a94a3f0

The cause for the bug is that when the "delayed" doorbell is invoked, it
takes a reference on the doorbell entry and schedules work that is
supposed to run the appropriate code and drop the doorbell entry
reference. The code ignores the fact that if the work is already queued,
it will not be scheduled to run one more time. As a result one of the
references would not be dropped. When the code waits for the reference
to get to zero, during balloon reset or module removal, it gets stuck.

Fix it. Drop the reference if schedule_work() indicates that the work is
already queued.

Note that this bug got more apparent (or apparent at all) due to
commit ce664331 ("vmw_balloon: VMCI_DOORBELL_SET does not check status").

Fixes: 83e2ec76 ("VMCI: doorbell implementation.")
Reported-by: default avatarFrancois Rigault <rigault.francois@gmail.com>
Cc: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>
Cc: Adit Ranadive <aditr@vmware.com>
Cc: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>
Cc: Vishnu DASA <vdasa@vmware.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarNadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarVishnu Dasa <vdasa@vmware.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190820202638.49003-1-namit@vmware.comSigned-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarConnor Kuehl <connor.kuehl@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKhalid Elmously <khalid.elmously@canonical.com>
parent 6f919cc9
......@@ -318,7 +318,8 @@ int vmci_dbell_host_context_notify(u32 src_cid, struct vmci_handle handle)
entry = container_of(resource, struct dbell_entry, resource);
if (entry->run_delayed) {
schedule_work(&entry->work);
if (!schedule_work(&entry->work))
vmci_resource_put(resource);
} else {
entry->notify_cb(entry->client_data);
vmci_resource_put(resource);
......@@ -366,7 +367,8 @@ static void dbell_fire_entries(u32 notify_idx)
atomic_read(&dbell->active) == 1) {
if (dbell->run_delayed) {
vmci_resource_get(&dbell->resource);
schedule_work(&dbell->work);
if (!schedule_work(&dbell->work))
vmci_resource_put(&dbell->resource);
} else {
dbell->notify_cb(dbell->client_data);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment