posix-cpu-timers: Fix two trivial comments

Recent changes modified the function arguments of
thread_group_sample_cputime() and task_cputimers_expired(), but forgot to
update the comments. Fix it up.

[ tglx: Changed the argument name of task_cputimers_expired() as the pointer
  	points to an array of samples. ]

Fixes: b7be4ef1 ("posix-cpu-timers: Switch thread group sampling to array")
Fixes: 001f7971 ("posix-cpu-timers: Make expiry checks array based")
Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1571643852-21848-1-git-send-email-wang.yi59@zte.com.cn

kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c

@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static void update_gt_cputime(struct task_cputime_atomic *cputime_atomic,
 /**
  * thread_group_sample_cputime - Sample cputime for a given task
  * @tsk:	Task for which cputime needs to be started
- * @iimes:	Storage for time samples
+ * @samples:	Storage for time samples
  *
  * Called from sys_getitimer() to calculate the expiry time of an active
  * timer. That means group cputime accounting is already active. Called
@@ -1038,12 +1038,12 @@ static void posix_cpu_timer_rearm(struct k_itimer *timer)
  * member of @pct->bases[CLK].nextevt. False otherwise
  */
 static inline bool
-task_cputimers_expired(const u64 *sample, struct posix_cputimers *pct)
+task_cputimers_expired(const u64 *samples, struct posix_cputimers *pct)
 {
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < CPUCLOCK_MAX; i++) {
-		if (sample[i] >= pct->bases[i].nextevt)
+		if (samples[i] >= pct->bases[i].nextevt)
 			return true;
 	}
 	return false;