Commit 7f342678 authored by Vadim Lomovtsev's avatar Vadim Lomovtsev Committed by Bjorn Helgaas

PCI: Set Cavium ACS capability quirk flags to assert RR/CR/SV/UF

The Cavium ThunderX (CN8XXX) family of PCIe Root Ports does not advertise
an ACS capability.  However, the RTL internally implements similar
protection as if ACS had Request Redirection, Completion Redirection,
Source Validation, and Upstream Forwarding features enabled.

Change Cavium ACS capabilities quirk flags accordingly.

Fixes: b404bcfb ("PCI: Add ACS quirk for all Cavium devices")
Signed-off-by: default avatarVadim Lomovtsev <Vadim.Lomovtsev@cavium.com>
[bhelgaas: tidy changelog, comment, stable tag]
Signed-off-by: default avatarBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v4.6+: b77d537d: PCI: Apply Cavium ACS quirk only to CN81xx/CN83xx/CN88xx devices
parent ff26449e
...@@ -4214,12 +4214,14 @@ static int pci_quirk_amd_sb_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags) ...@@ -4214,12 +4214,14 @@ static int pci_quirk_amd_sb_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
static int pci_quirk_cavium_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags) static int pci_quirk_cavium_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
{ {
/* /*
* Cavium devices matching this quirk do not perform peer-to-peer * Cavium root ports don't advertise an ACS capability. However,
* with other functions, allowing masking out these bits as if they * the RTL internally implements similar protection as if ACS had
* were unimplemented in the ACS capability. * Request Redirection, Completion Redirection, Source Validation,
*/ * and Upstream Forwarding features enabled. Assert that the
acs_flags &= ~(PCI_ACS_SV | PCI_ACS_TB | PCI_ACS_RR | * hardware implements and enables equivalent ACS functionality for
PCI_ACS_CR | PCI_ACS_UF | PCI_ACS_DT); * these flags.
*/
acs_flags &= ~(PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR | PCI_ACS_SV | PCI_ACS_UF);
if (!((dev->device >= 0xa000) && (dev->device <= 0xa0ff))) if (!((dev->device >= 0xa000) && (dev->device <= 0xa0ff)))
return -ENOTTY; return -ENOTTY;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment