Commit 80f0fd8a authored by Wei Yongjun's avatar Wei Yongjun Committed by David S. Miller

openvswitch: using kfree_rcu() to simplify the code

The callback function of call_rcu() just calls a kfree(), so we
can use kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu() + callback function.

spatch with a semantic match is used to found this problem.
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
Signed-off-by: default avatarWei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
Acked-by: default avatarJesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent fc61b928
......@@ -427,19 +427,11 @@ void ovs_flow_deferred_free(struct sw_flow *flow)
call_rcu(&flow->rcu, rcu_free_flow_callback);
}
/* RCU callback used by ovs_flow_deferred_free_acts. */
static void rcu_free_acts_callback(struct rcu_head *rcu)
{
struct sw_flow_actions *sf_acts = container_of(rcu,
struct sw_flow_actions, rcu);
kfree(sf_acts);
}
/* Schedules 'sf_acts' to be freed after the next RCU grace period.
* The caller must hold rcu_read_lock for this to be sensible. */
void ovs_flow_deferred_free_acts(struct sw_flow_actions *sf_acts)
{
call_rcu(&sf_acts->rcu, rcu_free_acts_callback);
kfree_rcu(sf_acts, rcu);
}
static int parse_vlan(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sw_flow_key *key)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment