Commit 837cf45d authored by Paolo Abeni's avatar Paolo Abeni Committed by David S. Miller

mptcp: fix race in incoming ADD_ADDR option processing

If an MPTCP endpoint received multiple consecutive incoming
ADD_ADDR options, mptcp_pm_add_addr_received() can overwrite
the current remote address value after the PM lock is released
in mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received() and before such address
is echoed.

Fix the issue caching the remote address value a little earlier
and always using the cached value after releasing the PM lock.

Fixes: f7efc777 ("mptcp: drop argument port from mptcp_pm_announce_addr")
Reviewed-by: default avatarMatthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 98247bc1
...@@ -660,6 +660,7 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk) ...@@ -660,6 +660,7 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
unsigned int add_addr_accept_max; unsigned int add_addr_accept_max;
struct mptcp_addr_info remote; struct mptcp_addr_info remote;
unsigned int subflows_max; unsigned int subflows_max;
bool reset_port = false;
int i, nr; int i, nr;
add_addr_accept_max = mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_accept_max(msk); add_addr_accept_max = mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_accept_max(msk);
...@@ -669,15 +670,19 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk) ...@@ -669,15 +670,19 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
msk->pm.add_addr_accepted, add_addr_accept_max, msk->pm.add_addr_accepted, add_addr_accept_max,
msk->pm.remote.family); msk->pm.remote.family);
if (lookup_subflow_by_daddr(&msk->conn_list, &msk->pm.remote)) remote = msk->pm.remote;
if (lookup_subflow_by_daddr(&msk->conn_list, &remote))
goto add_addr_echo; goto add_addr_echo;
/* pick id 0 port, if none is provided the remote address */
if (!remote.port) {
reset_port = true;
remote.port = sk->sk_dport;
}
/* connect to the specified remote address, using whatever /* connect to the specified remote address, using whatever
* local address the routing configuration will pick. * local address the routing configuration will pick.
*/ */
remote = msk->pm.remote;
if (!remote.port)
remote.port = sk->sk_dport;
nr = fill_local_addresses_vec(msk, addrs); nr = fill_local_addresses_vec(msk, addrs);
msk->pm.add_addr_accepted++; msk->pm.add_addr_accepted++;
...@@ -690,8 +695,12 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk) ...@@ -690,8 +695,12 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
__mptcp_subflow_connect(sk, &addrs[i], &remote); __mptcp_subflow_connect(sk, &addrs[i], &remote);
spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
/* be sure to echo exactly the received address */
if (reset_port)
remote.port = 0;
add_addr_echo: add_addr_echo:
mptcp_pm_announce_addr(msk, &msk->pm.remote, true); mptcp_pm_announce_addr(msk, &remote, true);
mptcp_pm_nl_addr_send_ack(msk); mptcp_pm_nl_addr_send_ack(msk);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment