Commit 853b160a authored by Ingo Molnar's avatar Ingo Molnar

Revert f5d6a52f ("x86/smpboot: Skip delays during SMP initialization similar to Xen")

Huang Ying reported x86 boot hangs due to this commit.

Turns out that the change, despite its changelog, does more
than just change timeouts: it also changes the way we
assert/deassert INIT via the APIC_DM_INIT IPI, in the x2apic
case it skips the deassert step.

This is historically fragile code and the patch did not
improve it, so revert these changes.

This commit:

  1a744cb3 ("x86/smp/boot: Remove 10ms delay from cpu_up() on modern processors")

independently removes the worst of the delays (the 10 msec delay).

The remaining delays can be addressed one by one, combined
with careful testing.
Reported-by: default avatarHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Gang Wei <gang.wei@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jan H. Schönherr <jschoenh@amazon.de>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430732554-7294-1-git-send-email-jschoenh@amazon.deSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 1a744cb3
......@@ -614,7 +614,6 @@ wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init(int phys_apicid, unsigned long start_eip)
apic_icr_write(APIC_INT_LEVELTRIG | APIC_INT_ASSERT | APIC_DM_INIT,
phys_apicid);
if (!cpu_has_x2apic) {
pr_debug("Waiting for send to finish...\n");
send_status = safe_apic_wait_icr_idle();
......@@ -631,17 +630,6 @@ wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init(int phys_apicid, unsigned long start_eip)
mb();
atomic_set(&init_deasserted, 1);
} else if (tboot_enabled()) {
/*
* With tboot AP is actually spinning in a mini-guest before
* receiving INIT. Upon receiving INIT ipi, AP need time to
* VMExit, update VMCS to tracking SIPIs and VMResume.
*
* While AP is in root mode handling the INIT the CPU will drop
* any SIPIs
*/
udelay(10);
}
/*
* Should we send STARTUP IPIs ?
......@@ -683,7 +671,6 @@ wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init(int phys_apicid, unsigned long start_eip)
apic_icr_write(APIC_DM_STARTUP | (start_eip >> 12),
phys_apicid);
if (!cpu_has_x2apic) {
/*
* Give the other CPU some time to accept the IPI.
*/
......@@ -698,7 +685,6 @@ wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init(int phys_apicid, unsigned long start_eip)
* Give the other CPU some time to accept the IPI.
*/
udelay(200);
}
if (maxlvt > 3) /* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */
apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment