btrfs: simplify return values in setup_nodes_for_search

The function is needlessly convoluted. Fix that by:

* removing redundant sret variable definition in both if arms

* replace the again/done labels with direct return statements, the
  function is short enough and doesn't do anything special upon exit

* remove BUG_ON on split_node returning a positive number - it can't
  happen as split_node returns either 0 or a negative error code.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

fs/btrfs/ctree.c

@@ -2387,56 +2387,42 @@ setup_nodes_for_search(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		       int *write_lock_level)
 {
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if ((p->search_for_split || ins_len > 0) && btrfs_header_nritems(b) >=
 	    BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK(fs_info) - 3) {
-		int sret;
 
 		if (*write_lock_level < level + 1) {
 			*write_lock_level = level + 1;
 			btrfs_release_path(p);
-			goto again;
+			return -EAGAIN;
 		}
 
 		reada_for_balance(p, level);
-		sret = split_node(trans, root, p, level);
+		ret = split_node(trans, root, p, level);
 
-		BUG_ON(sret > 0);
-		if (sret) {
-			ret = sret;
-			goto done;
-		}
 		b = p->nodes[level];
 	} else if (ins_len < 0 && btrfs_header_nritems(b) <
 		   BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK(fs_info) / 2) {
-		int sret;
 
 		if (*write_lock_level < level + 1) {
 			*write_lock_level = level + 1;
 			btrfs_release_path(p);
-			goto again;
+			return -EAGAIN;
 		}
 
 		reada_for_balance(p, level);
-		sret = balance_level(trans, root, p, level);
+		ret = balance_level(trans, root, p, level);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 
-		if (sret) {
-			ret = sret;
-			goto done;
-		}
 		b = p->nodes[level];
 		if (!b) {
 			btrfs_release_path(p);
-			goto again;
+			return -EAGAIN;
 		}
 		BUG_ON(btrfs_header_nritems(b) == 1);
 	}
-	return 0;
-
-again:
-	ret = -EAGAIN;
-done:
 	return ret;
 }