Commit 966b8266 authored by Edward Cree's avatar Edward Cree Committed by David S. Miller

sfc: fix boolreturn.cocci warning and rename function

check_fcs() was returning bool as 0/1, which was a sign that the sense
 of the function was unclear: false was good, which doesn't really match
 a name like 'check_$thing'.  So rename it to ef100_has_fcs_error(), and
 use proper booleans in the return statements.
Reported-by: default avatarkernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarEdward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 59ebb430
......@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ bool ef100_rx_buf_hash_valid(const u8 *prefix)
return PREFIX_FIELD(prefix, RSS_HASH_VALID);
}
static bool check_fcs(struct efx_channel *channel, u32 *prefix)
static bool ef100_has_fcs_error(struct efx_channel *channel, u32 *prefix)
{
u16 rxclass;
u8 l2status;
......@@ -46,11 +46,11 @@ static bool check_fcs(struct efx_channel *channel, u32 *prefix)
if (likely(l2status == ESE_GZ_RH_HCLASS_L2_STATUS_OK))
/* Everything is ok */
return 0;
return false;
if (l2status == ESE_GZ_RH_HCLASS_L2_STATUS_FCS_ERR)
channel->n_rx_eth_crc_err++;
return 1;
return true;
}
void __ef100_rx_packet(struct efx_channel *channel)
......@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ void __ef100_rx_packet(struct efx_channel *channel)
prefix = (u32 *)(eh - ESE_GZ_RX_PKT_PREFIX_LEN);
if (check_fcs(channel, prefix) &&
if (ef100_has_fcs_error(channel, prefix) &&
unlikely(!(efx->net_dev->features & NETIF_F_RXALL)))
goto out;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment