ARM: fix the cockup in the previous patch

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852110

Commit d6951f58 upstream.

The intention in the previous patch was to only place the processor
tables in the .rodata section if big.Little was being built and we
wanted the branch target hardening, but instead (due to the way it
was tested) it ended up always placing the tables into the .rodata
section.

Although harmless, let's correct this anyway.

Fixes: 3a4d0c21 ("ARM: ensure that processor vtables is not lost after boot")
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl <connor.kuehl@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Khalid Elmously <khalid.elmously@canonical.com>

arch/arm/mm/proc-macros.S

@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@
  * If we are building for big.Little with branch predictor hardening,
  * we need the processor function tables to remain available after boot.
  */
-#if 1 // defined(CONFIG_BIG_LITTLE) && defined(CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR)
+#if defined(CONFIG_BIG_LITTLE) && defined(CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR)
 	.section ".rodata"
 #endif
 	.type	\name\()_processor_functions, #object
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ ENTRY(\name\()_processor_functions)
 	.endif
 
 	.size	\name\()_processor_functions, . - \name\()_processor_functions
-#if 1 // defined(CONFIG_BIG_LITTLE) && defined(CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR)
+#if defined(CONFIG_BIG_LITTLE) && defined(CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR)
 	.previous
 #endif
 .endm