Commit 97e914b7 authored by Mark Tomlinson's avatar Mark Tomlinson Committed by Paul Burton

MIPS: cavium_octeon: Fix syncw generation.

The Cavium Octeon CPU uses a special sync instruction for implementing
wmb, and due to a CPU bug, the instruction must appear twice. A macro
had been defined to hide this:

 #define __SYNC_rpt(type)     (1 + (type == __SYNC_wmb))

which was intended to evaluate to 2 for __SYNC_wmb, and 1 for any other
type of sync. However, this expression is evaluated by the assembler,
and not the compiler, and the result of '==' in the assembler is 0 or
-1, not 0 or 1 as it is in C. The net result was wmb() producing no code
at all. The simple fix in this patch is to change the '+' to '-'.

Fixes: bf929272 ("MIPS: barrier: Add __SYNC() infrastructure")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Tomlinson <mark.tomlinson@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Tested-by: default avatarChris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
parent 976c23af
...@@ -155,9 +155,11 @@ ...@@ -155,9 +155,11 @@
* effective barrier as noted by commit 6b07d38aaa52 ("MIPS: Octeon: Use * effective barrier as noted by commit 6b07d38aaa52 ("MIPS: Octeon: Use
* optimized memory barrier primitives."). Here we specify that the affected * optimized memory barrier primitives."). Here we specify that the affected
* sync instructions should be emitted twice. * sync instructions should be emitted twice.
* Note that this expression is evaluated by the assembler (not the compiler),
* and that the assembler evaluates '==' as 0 or -1, not 0 or 1.
*/ */
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON
# define __SYNC_rpt(type) (1 + (type == __SYNC_wmb)) # define __SYNC_rpt(type) (1 - (type == __SYNC_wmb))
#else #else
# define __SYNC_rpt(type) 1 # define __SYNC_rpt(type) 1
#endif #endif
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment