Commit 991454e1 authored by Kuninori Morimoto's avatar Kuninori Morimoto Committed by Mark Brown

ASoC: core: remove pointless auxiliary from snd_soc_component

commit 1a653aa4 ("ASoC: core: replace aux_comp_list to ...")
tried to replace aux_comp_list to component_dev_list,
but it failed because of binding timing. Thus, Sylwester fixuped it by
commit d2e3a135 ("ASoC: Fix binding and probing of auxiliary...").

One of main purpose of commit 1a653aa4 ("ASoC: core: replace...")
was remove replaceable list (= list_aux) from snd_soc_component by using
new "auxiliary" flags (but it failed).
Because of this background, current code has reborned card_aux_list
(= same as original list_aux), and almost pointless "auxiliary" flags.

Let's remove pointless "auxiliary" flags by this patch
This means, it is same as revert both
commit 1a653aa4 ("ASoC: core: replace aux_comp_list to ...") and
commit d2e3a135 ("ASoC: Fix binding and probing of auxiliary...").
Signed-off-by: default avatarKuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: default avatarSylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
parent ec5a82d6
......@@ -812,7 +812,6 @@ struct snd_soc_component {
unsigned int ignore_pmdown_time:1; /* pmdown_time is ignored at stop */
unsigned int registered_as_component:1;
unsigned int auxiliary:1; /* for auxiliary component of the card */
unsigned int suspended:1; /* is in suspend PM state */
struct list_head list;
......
......@@ -1776,7 +1776,6 @@ static int soc_bind_aux_dev(struct snd_soc_card *card, int num)
}
component->init = aux_dev->init;
component->auxiliary = 1;
list_add(&component->card_aux_list, &card->aux_comp_list);
return 0;
......@@ -1788,14 +1787,13 @@ static int soc_bind_aux_dev(struct snd_soc_card *card, int num)
static int soc_probe_aux_devices(struct snd_soc_card *card)
{
struct snd_soc_component *comp, *tmp;
struct snd_soc_component *comp;
int order;
int ret;
for (order = SND_SOC_COMP_ORDER_FIRST; order <= SND_SOC_COMP_ORDER_LAST;
order++) {
list_for_each_entry_safe(comp, tmp, &card->aux_comp_list,
card_aux_list) {
list_for_each_entry(comp, &card->aux_comp_list, card_aux_list) {
if (comp->driver->probe_order == order) {
ret = soc_probe_component(card, comp);
if (ret < 0) {
......@@ -1804,7 +1802,6 @@ static int soc_probe_aux_devices(struct snd_soc_card *card)
comp->name, ret);
return ret;
}
list_del(&comp->card_aux_list);
}
}
}
......@@ -1820,14 +1817,12 @@ static void soc_remove_aux_devices(struct snd_soc_card *card)
for (order = SND_SOC_COMP_ORDER_FIRST; order <= SND_SOC_COMP_ORDER_LAST;
order++) {
list_for_each_entry_safe(comp, _comp,
&card->component_dev_list, card_list) {
if (!comp->auxiliary)
continue;
&card->aux_comp_list, card_aux_list) {
if (comp->driver->remove_order == order) {
soc_remove_component(comp);
comp->auxiliary = 0;
/* remove it from the card's aux_comp_list */
list_del(&comp->card_aux_list);
}
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment