Merge branch 'Add libbpf support for USDTs'
Andrii Nakryiko says: ==================== Add libbpf support for USDT (User Statically-Defined Tracing) probes. USDTs is important part of tracing, and BPF, ecosystem, widely used in mission-critical production applications for observability, performance analysis, and debugging. And while USDTs themselves are pretty complicated abstraction built on top of uprobes, for end-users USDT is as natural a primitive as uprobes themselves. And thus it's important for libbpf to provide best possible user experience when it comes to build tracing applications relying on USDTs. USDTs historically presented a lot of challenges for libbpf's no compilation-on-the-fly general approach to BPF tracing. BCC utilizes power of on-the-fly source code generation and compilation using its embedded Clang toolchain, which was impractical for more lightweight and thus more rigid libbpf-based approach. But still, with enough diligence and BPF cookies it's possible to implement USDT support that feels as natural as tracing any uprobe. This patch set is the culmination of such effort to add libbpf USDT support following the spirit and philosophy of BPF CO-RE (even though it's not inherently relying on BPF CO-RE much, see patch #1 for some notes regarding this). Each respective patch has enough details and explanations, so I won't go into details here. In the end, I think the overall usability of libbpf's USDT support *exceeds* the status quo set by BCC due to the elimination of awkward runtime USDT supporting code generation. It also exceeds BCC's capabilities due to the use of BPF cookie. This eliminates the need to determine a USDT call site (and thus specifics about how exactly to fetch arguments) based on its *absolute IP address*, which is impossible with shared libraries if no PID is specified (as we then just *can't* know absolute IP at which shared library is loaded, because it might be different for each process). With BPF cookie this is not a problem as we record "call site ID" directly in a BPF cookie value. This makes it possible to do a system-wide tracing of a USDT defined in a shared library. Think about tracing some USDT in libc across any process in the system, both running at the time of attachment and all the new processes started *afterwards*. This is a very powerful capability that allows more efficient observability and tracing tooling. Once this functionality lands, the plan is to extend libbpf-bootstrap ([0]) with an USDT example. It will also become possible to start converting BCC tools that rely on USDTs to their libbpf-based counterparts ([1]). It's worth noting that preliminary version of this code was currently used and tested in production code running fleet-wide observability toolkit. Libbpf functionality is broken down into 5 mostly logically independent parts, for ease of reviewing: - patch #1 adds BPF-side implementation; - patch #2 adds user-space APIs and wires bpf_link for USDTs; - patch #3 adds the most mundate pieces: handling ELF, parsing USDT notes, dealing with memory segments, relative vs absolute addresses, etc; - patch #4 adds internal ID allocation and setting up/tearing down of BPF-side state (spec and IP-to-ID mapping); - patch #5 implements x86/x86-64-specific logic of parsing USDT argument specifications; - patch #6 adds testing of various basic aspects of handling of USDT; - patch #7 extends the set of tests with more combinations of semaphore, executable vs shared library, and PID filter options. [0] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf-bootstrap [1] https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/tree/master/libbpf-tools v2->v3: - fix typos, leave link to systemtap doc, acks, etc (Dave); - include sys/sdt.h to avoid extra system-wide package dependencies; v1->v2: - huge high-level comment describing how all the moving parts fit together (Alan, Alexei); - switched from `__hidden __weak` to `static inline __noinline` for now, as there is a bug in BPF linker breaking final BPF object file due to invalid .BTF.ext data; I want to fix it separately at which point I'll switch back to __hidden __weak again. The fix isn't trivial, so I don't want to block on that. Same for __weak variable lookup bug that Henqi reported. - various fixes and improvements, addressing other feedback (Alan, Hengqi); Cc: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Cc: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Cc: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> ==================== Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Showing
tools/lib/bpf/usdt.bpf.h
0 → 100644
tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
0 → 100644
This diff is collapsed.
This diff is collapsed.
This diff is collapsed.
Please register or sign in to comment