Commit a7558e01 authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched: Add WF_FORK

Avoid the cache buddies from biasing the time distribution away
from fork()ers. Normally the next buddy will be the preferred
scheduling target, but this makes fork()s prefer to run the new
child, whereas we prefer to run the parent, since that will
generate more work.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 7d478721
......@@ -1028,6 +1028,7 @@ struct sched_domain;
* wake flags
*/
#define WF_SYNC 0x01 /* waker goes to sleep after wakup */
#define WF_FORK 0x02 /* child wakeup after fork */
struct sched_class {
const struct sched_class *next;
......
......@@ -2602,7 +2602,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags)
inc_nr_running(rq);
}
trace_sched_wakeup_new(rq, p, 1);
check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0);
check_preempt_curr(rq, p, WF_FORK);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (p->sched_class->task_wake_up)
p->sched_class->task_wake_up(rq, p);
......
......@@ -1580,7 +1580,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags
*/
if (sched_feat(LAST_BUDDY) && likely(se->on_rq && curr != rq->idle))
set_last_buddy(se);
if (sched_feat(NEXT_BUDDY))
if (sched_feat(NEXT_BUDDY) && !(flags & WF_FORK))
set_next_buddy(pse);
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment