Commit a8631f6d authored by Richard Genoud's avatar Richard Genoud Committed by Mathieu Poirier

remoteproc: k3-r5: Fix IPC-only mode detection

ret variable was used to test reset status, get from
reset_control_status() call. But this variable was overwritten by
ti_sci_proc_get_status() a few lines bellow.
And as ti_sci_proc_get_status() returns 0 or a negative value (in this
latter case, followed by a return), the expression !ret was always true,

Clearly, this was not what was intended:
In the comment above it's said that "requires both local and module
resets to be deasserted"; if reset_control_status() returns 0 it means
that the reset line is deasserted.
So, it's pretty clear that the return value of reset_control_status()
was intended to be used instead of ti_sci_proc_get_status() return
value.

This could lead in an incorrect IPC-only mode detection if reset line is
asserted (so reset_control_status() return > 0) and c_state != 0 and
halted == 0.
In this case, the old code would have detected an IPC-only mode instead
of a mismatched mode.

Fixes: 1168af40 ("remoteproc: k3-r5: Add support for IPC-only mode for all R5Fs")
Signed-off-by: default avatarRichard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarHari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240621150058.319524-2-richard.genoud@bootlin.comSigned-off-by: default avatarMathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
parent 67ca3f98
...@@ -1144,6 +1144,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) ...@@ -1144,6 +1144,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
u32 atcm_enable, btcm_enable, loczrama; u32 atcm_enable, btcm_enable, loczrama;
struct k3_r5_core *core0; struct k3_r5_core *core0;
enum cluster_mode mode = cluster->mode; enum cluster_mode mode = cluster->mode;
int reset_ctrl_status;
int ret; int ret;
core0 = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem); core0 = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem);
...@@ -1160,11 +1161,11 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) ...@@ -1160,11 +1161,11 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
r_state, c_state); r_state, c_state);
} }
ret = reset_control_status(core->reset); reset_ctrl_status = reset_control_status(core->reset);
if (ret < 0) { if (reset_ctrl_status < 0) {
dev_err(cdev, "failed to get initial local reset status, ret = %d\n", dev_err(cdev, "failed to get initial local reset status, ret = %d\n",
ret); reset_ctrl_status);
return ret; return reset_ctrl_status;
} }
/* /*
...@@ -1199,7 +1200,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) ...@@ -1199,7 +1200,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
* irrelevant if module reset is asserted (POR value has local reset * irrelevant if module reset is asserted (POR value has local reset
* deasserted), and is deemed as remoteproc mode * deasserted), and is deemed as remoteproc mode
*/ */
if (c_state && !ret && !halted) { if (c_state && !reset_ctrl_status && !halted) {
dev_info(cdev, "configured R5F for IPC-only mode\n"); dev_info(cdev, "configured R5F for IPC-only mode\n");
kproc->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED; kproc->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
ret = 1; ret = 1;
...@@ -1217,7 +1218,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) ...@@ -1217,7 +1218,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
ret = 0; ret = 0;
} else { } else {
dev_err(cdev, "mismatched mode: local_reset = %s, module_reset = %s, core_state = %s\n", dev_err(cdev, "mismatched mode: local_reset = %s, module_reset = %s, core_state = %s\n",
!ret ? "deasserted" : "asserted", !reset_ctrl_status ? "deasserted" : "asserted",
c_state ? "deasserted" : "asserted", c_state ? "deasserted" : "asserted",
halted ? "halted" : "unhalted"); halted ? "halted" : "unhalted");
ret = -EINVAL; ret = -EINVAL;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment