Commit ab673b98 authored by Eric Biggers's avatar Eric Biggers

fscrypt: use smp_load_acquire() for ->i_crypt_info

Normally smp_store_release() or cmpxchg_release() is paired with
smp_load_acquire().  Sometimes smp_load_acquire() can be replaced with
the more lightweight READ_ONCE().  However, for this to be safe, all the
published memory must only be accessed in a way that involves the
pointer itself.  This may not be the case if allocating the object also
involves initializing a static or global variable, for example.

fscrypt_info includes various sub-objects which are internal to and are
allocated by other kernel subsystems such as keyrings and crypto.  So by
using READ_ONCE() for ->i_crypt_info, we're relying on internal
implementation details of these other kernel subsystems.

Remove this fragile assumption by using smp_load_acquire() instead.

(Note: I haven't seen any real-world problems here.  This change is just
fixing the code to be guaranteed correct and less fragile.)

Fixes: e37a784d ("fscrypt: use READ_ONCE() to access ->i_crypt_info")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721225920.114347-5-ebiggers@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
parent 777afe4e
...@@ -518,7 +518,17 @@ int fscrypt_get_encryption_info(struct inode *inode) ...@@ -518,7 +518,17 @@ int fscrypt_get_encryption_info(struct inode *inode)
if (res) if (res)
goto out; goto out;
/*
* Multiple tasks may race to set ->i_crypt_info, so use
* cmpxchg_release(). This pairs with the smp_load_acquire() in
* fscrypt_get_info(). I.e., here we publish ->i_crypt_info with a
* RELEASE barrier so that other tasks can ACQUIRE it.
*/
if (cmpxchg_release(&inode->i_crypt_info, NULL, crypt_info) == NULL) { if (cmpxchg_release(&inode->i_crypt_info, NULL, crypt_info) == NULL) {
/*
* We won the race and set ->i_crypt_info to our crypt_info.
* Now link it into the master key's inode list.
*/
if (master_key) { if (master_key) {
struct fscrypt_master_key *mk = struct fscrypt_master_key *mk =
master_key->payload.data[0]; master_key->payload.data[0];
...@@ -589,7 +599,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(fscrypt_free_inode); ...@@ -589,7 +599,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(fscrypt_free_inode);
*/ */
int fscrypt_drop_inode(struct inode *inode) int fscrypt_drop_inode(struct inode *inode)
{ {
const struct fscrypt_info *ci = READ_ONCE(inode->i_crypt_info); const struct fscrypt_info *ci = fscrypt_get_info(inode);
const struct fscrypt_master_key *mk; const struct fscrypt_master_key *mk;
/* /*
......
...@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int fscrypt_get_policy(struct inode *inode, union fscrypt_policy *policy) ...@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int fscrypt_get_policy(struct inode *inode, union fscrypt_policy *policy)
union fscrypt_context ctx; union fscrypt_context ctx;
int ret; int ret;
ci = READ_ONCE(inode->i_crypt_info); ci = fscrypt_get_info(inode);
if (ci) { if (ci) {
/* key available, use the cached policy */ /* key available, use the cached policy */
*policy = ci->ci_policy; *policy = ci->ci_policy;
...@@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ int fscrypt_inherit_context(struct inode *parent, struct inode *child, ...@@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ int fscrypt_inherit_context(struct inode *parent, struct inode *child,
if (res < 0) if (res < 0)
return res; return res;
ci = READ_ONCE(parent->i_crypt_info); ci = fscrypt_get_info(parent);
if (ci == NULL) if (ci == NULL)
return -ENOKEY; return -ENOKEY;
......
...@@ -74,10 +74,15 @@ struct fscrypt_operations { ...@@ -74,10 +74,15 @@ struct fscrypt_operations {
struct request_queue **devs); struct request_queue **devs);
}; };
static inline bool fscrypt_has_encryption_key(const struct inode *inode) static inline struct fscrypt_info *fscrypt_get_info(const struct inode *inode)
{ {
/* pairs with cmpxchg_release() in fscrypt_get_encryption_info() */ /*
return READ_ONCE(inode->i_crypt_info) != NULL; * Pairs with the cmpxchg_release() in fscrypt_get_encryption_info().
* I.e., another task may publish ->i_crypt_info concurrently, executing
* a RELEASE barrier. We need to use smp_load_acquire() here to safely
* ACQUIRE the memory the other task published.
*/
return smp_load_acquire(&inode->i_crypt_info);
} }
/** /**
...@@ -234,9 +239,9 @@ static inline void fscrypt_set_ops(struct super_block *sb, ...@@ -234,9 +239,9 @@ static inline void fscrypt_set_ops(struct super_block *sb,
} }
#else /* !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION */ #else /* !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION */
static inline bool fscrypt_has_encryption_key(const struct inode *inode) static inline struct fscrypt_info *fscrypt_get_info(const struct inode *inode)
{ {
return false; return NULL;
} }
static inline bool fscrypt_needs_contents_encryption(const struct inode *inode) static inline bool fscrypt_needs_contents_encryption(const struct inode *inode)
...@@ -619,6 +624,20 @@ static inline bool fscrypt_inode_uses_fs_layer_crypto(const struct inode *inode) ...@@ -619,6 +624,20 @@ static inline bool fscrypt_inode_uses_fs_layer_crypto(const struct inode *inode)
!__fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto(inode); !__fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto(inode);
} }
/**
* fscrypt_has_encryption_key() - check whether an inode has had its key set up
* @inode: the inode to check
*
* Return: %true if the inode has had its encryption key set up, else %false.
*
* Usually this should be preceded by fscrypt_get_encryption_info() to try to
* set up the key first.
*/
static inline bool fscrypt_has_encryption_key(const struct inode *inode)
{
return fscrypt_get_info(inode) != NULL;
}
/** /**
* fscrypt_require_key() - require an inode's encryption key * fscrypt_require_key() - require an inode's encryption key
* @inode: the inode we need the key for * @inode: the inode we need the key for
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment