Commit b18c1bb4 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson

drm/i915: Remove 64b mmio write vfuncs

We don't have safe 64-bit mmio writes as they are really split into
2x32-bit writes. This tearing is dangerous as the hardware *will*
operate on the intermediate value, requiring great care when assigning.
(See, for example, i965_write_fence_reg.) As such we don't currently use
them and strongly advise not to us them. Go one step further and remove
the 64-bit write vfuncs.

v2: Add some more details to the comment about why WRITE64 is absent,
and why you need to think twice before using READ64.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160906144538.4204-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
parent e320d400
......@@ -579,8 +579,6 @@ struct intel_uncore_funcs {
uint16_t val, bool trace);
void (*mmio_writel)(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, i915_reg_t r,
uint32_t val, bool trace);
void (*mmio_writeq)(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, i915_reg_t r,
uint64_t val, bool trace);
};
struct intel_uncore {
......@@ -3758,9 +3756,16 @@ int intel_freq_opcode(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int val);
* will be implemented using 2 32-bit writes in an arbitrary order with
* an arbitrary delay between them. This can cause the hardware to
* act upon the intermediate value, possibly leading to corruption and
* machine death. You have been warned.
* machine death. For this reason we do not support I915_WRITE64, or
* dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writeq.
*
* When reading a 64-bit value as two 32-bit values, the delay may cause
* the two reads to mismatch, e.g. a timestamp overflowing. Also note that
* occasionally a 64-bit register does not actualy support a full readq
* and must be read using two 32-bit reads.
*
* You have been warned.
*/
#define I915_WRITE64(reg, val) dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writeq(dev_priv, (reg), (val), true)
#define I915_READ64(reg) dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readq(dev_priv, (reg), true)
#define I915_READ64_2x32(lower_reg, upper_reg) ({ \
......
......@@ -1018,11 +1018,9 @@ gen5_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, i915_reg_t reg, u##x val, bool
__gen5_write(8)
__gen5_write(16)
__gen5_write(32)
__gen5_write(64)
__gen2_write(8)
__gen2_write(16)
__gen2_write(32)
__gen2_write(64)
#undef __gen5_write
#undef __gen2_write
......@@ -1112,23 +1110,18 @@ gen9_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, i915_reg_t reg, u##x val, \
__gen9_write(8)
__gen9_write(16)
__gen9_write(32)
__gen9_write(64)
__chv_write(8)
__chv_write(16)
__chv_write(32)
__chv_write(64)
__gen8_write(8)
__gen8_write(16)
__gen8_write(32)
__gen8_write(64)
__hsw_write(8)
__hsw_write(16)
__hsw_write(32)
__hsw_write(64)
__gen6_write(8)
__gen6_write(16)
__gen6_write(32)
__gen6_write(64)
#undef __gen9_write
#undef __chv_write
......@@ -1158,7 +1151,6 @@ static void vgpu_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, \
__vgpu_write(8)
__vgpu_write(16)
__vgpu_write(32)
__vgpu_write(64)
#undef __vgpu_write
#undef VGPU_WRITE_FOOTER
......@@ -1169,7 +1161,6 @@ do { \
dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writeb = x##_write8; \
dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writew = x##_write16; \
dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writel = x##_write32; \
dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writeq = x##_write64; \
} while (0)
#define ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(x) \
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment