Commit b58b2b3a authored by Yonghong Song's avatar Yonghong Song Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

libbpf: Fix an error in 64bit relocation value computation

Currently, the 64bit relocation value in the instruction
is computed as follows:
  __u64 imm = insn[0].imm + ((__u64)insn[1].imm << 32)

Suppose insn[0].imm = -1 (0xffffffff) and insn[1].imm = 1.
With the above computation, insn[0].imm will first sign-extend
to 64bit -1 (0xffffffffFFFFFFFF) and then add 0x1FFFFFFFF,
producing incorrect value 0xFFFFFFFF. The correct value
should be 0x1FFFFFFFF.

Changing insn[0].imm to __u32 first will prevent 64bit sign
extension and fix the issue. Merging high and low 32bit values
also changed from '+' to '|' to be consistent with other
similar occurences in kernel and libbpf.
Acked-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarDave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607062610.3717378-1-yhs@fb.comSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
parent 77628165
...@@ -1027,7 +1027,7 @@ int bpf_core_patch_insn(const char *prog_name, struct bpf_insn *insn, ...@@ -1027,7 +1027,7 @@ int bpf_core_patch_insn(const char *prog_name, struct bpf_insn *insn,
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;
} }
imm = insn[0].imm + ((__u64)insn[1].imm << 32); imm = (__u32)insn[0].imm | ((__u64)insn[1].imm << 32);
if (res->validate && imm != orig_val) { if (res->validate && imm != orig_val) {
pr_warn("prog '%s': relo #%d: unexpected insn #%d (LDIMM64) value: got %llu, exp %llu -> %llu\n", pr_warn("prog '%s': relo #%d: unexpected insn #%d (LDIMM64) value: got %llu, exp %llu -> %llu\n",
prog_name, relo_idx, prog_name, relo_idx,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment