Commit b7d7ca35 authored by J. Bruce Fields's avatar J. Bruce Fields

nfsd4: fix off-by-one-error in SEQUENCE reply

The values here represent highest slotid numbers.  Since slotid's are
numbered starting from zero, the highest should be one less than the
number of slots.
Reported-by: default avatarRick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
parent c152292f
...@@ -3221,9 +3221,9 @@ nfsd4_encode_sequence(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp, int nfserr, ...@@ -3221,9 +3221,9 @@ nfsd4_encode_sequence(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp, int nfserr,
WRITEMEM(seq->sessionid.data, NFS4_MAX_SESSIONID_LEN); WRITEMEM(seq->sessionid.data, NFS4_MAX_SESSIONID_LEN);
WRITE32(seq->seqid); WRITE32(seq->seqid);
WRITE32(seq->slotid); WRITE32(seq->slotid);
WRITE32(seq->maxslots); /* Note slotid's are numbered from zero: */
/* For now: target_maxslots = maxslots */ WRITE32(seq->maxslots - 1); /* sr_highest_slotid */
WRITE32(seq->maxslots); WRITE32(seq->maxslots - 1); /* sr_target_highest_slotid */
WRITE32(seq->status_flags); WRITE32(seq->status_flags);
ADJUST_ARGS(); ADJUST_ARGS();
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment