Commit b8f9301c authored by Andy Shevchenko's avatar Andy Shevchenko Committed by Linus Walleij

Revert "gpiolib: of: Introduce hook for missing gpio-ranges"

This reverts commit 3550bba2.

No users for this one, revert it for good.
The ->add_pin_ranges() can be used instead.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarStefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Tested-by: default avatarFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarBartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230113215352.44272-5-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
parent bc962997
...@@ -981,11 +981,6 @@ static int of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(struct gpio_chip *chip) ...@@ -981,11 +981,6 @@ static int of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(struct gpio_chip *chip)
if (!np) if (!np)
return 0; return 0;
if (!of_property_read_bool(np, "gpio-ranges") &&
chip->of_gpio_ranges_fallback) {
return chip->of_gpio_ranges_fallback(chip, np);
}
group_names = of_find_property(np, group_names_propname, NULL); group_names = of_find_property(np, group_names_propname, NULL);
for (;; index++) { for (;; index++) {
......
...@@ -525,18 +525,6 @@ struct gpio_chip { ...@@ -525,18 +525,6 @@ struct gpio_chip {
*/ */
int (*of_xlate)(struct gpio_chip *gc, int (*of_xlate)(struct gpio_chip *gc,
const struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec, u32 *flags); const struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec, u32 *flags);
/**
* @of_gpio_ranges_fallback:
*
* Optional hook for the case that no gpio-ranges property is defined
* within the device tree node "np" (usually DT before introduction
* of gpio-ranges). So this callback is helpful to provide the
* necessary backward compatibility for the pin ranges.
*/
int (*of_gpio_ranges_fallback)(struct gpio_chip *gc,
struct device_node *np);
#endif /* CONFIG_OF_GPIO */ #endif /* CONFIG_OF_GPIO */
}; };
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment