Commit ba59eae7 authored by Alex Shi's avatar Alex Shi Committed by Paul Moore

audit: fix macros warnings

Some unused macros could cause gcc warning:
kernel/audit.c:68:0: warning: macro "AUDIT_UNINITIALIZED" is not used
[-Wunused-macros]
kernel/auditsc.c:104:0: warning: macro "AUDIT_AUX_IPCPERM" is not used
[-Wunused-macros]
kernel/auditsc.c:82:0: warning: macro "AUDITSC_INVALID" is not used
[-Wunused-macros]

AUDIT_UNINITIALIZED and AUDITSC_INVALID are still meaningful and should
be in incorporated.

Just remove AUDIT_AUX_IPCPERM.

Thanks comments from Richard Guy Briggs and Paul Moore.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
parent 6d915476
...@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ ...@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
#define AUDIT_DISABLED -1 #define AUDIT_DISABLED -1
#define AUDIT_UNINITIALIZED 0 #define AUDIT_UNINITIALIZED 0
#define AUDIT_INITIALIZED 1 #define AUDIT_INITIALIZED 1
static int audit_initialized; static int audit_initialized = AUDIT_UNINITIALIZED;
u32 audit_enabled = AUDIT_OFF; u32 audit_enabled = AUDIT_OFF;
bool audit_ever_enabled = !!AUDIT_OFF; bool audit_ever_enabled = !!AUDIT_OFF;
......
...@@ -102,8 +102,6 @@ struct audit_aux_data { ...@@ -102,8 +102,6 @@ struct audit_aux_data {
int type; int type;
}; };
#define AUDIT_AUX_IPCPERM 0
/* Number of target pids per aux struct. */ /* Number of target pids per aux struct. */
#define AUDIT_AUX_PIDS 16 #define AUDIT_AUX_PIDS 16
...@@ -552,11 +550,11 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, ...@@ -552,11 +550,11 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
break; break;
case AUDIT_EXIT: case AUDIT_EXIT:
if (ctx && ctx->return_valid) if (ctx && ctx->return_valid != AUDITSC_INVALID)
result = audit_comparator(ctx->return_code, f->op, f->val); result = audit_comparator(ctx->return_code, f->op, f->val);
break; break;
case AUDIT_SUCCESS: case AUDIT_SUCCESS:
if (ctx && ctx->return_valid) { if (ctx && ctx->return_valid != AUDITSC_INVALID) {
if (f->val) if (f->val)
result = audit_comparator(ctx->return_valid, f->op, AUDITSC_SUCCESS); result = audit_comparator(ctx->return_valid, f->op, AUDITSC_SUCCESS);
else else
...@@ -930,6 +928,7 @@ static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_context(enum audit_state state) ...@@ -930,6 +928,7 @@ static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_context(enum audit_state state)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&context->killed_trees); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&context->killed_trees);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&context->names_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&context->names_list);
context->fds[0] = -1; context->fds[0] = -1;
context->return_valid = AUDITSC_INVALID;
return context; return context;
} }
...@@ -1488,7 +1487,7 @@ static void audit_log_exit(void) ...@@ -1488,7 +1487,7 @@ static void audit_log_exit(void)
context->arch, context->major); context->arch, context->major);
if (context->personality != PER_LINUX) if (context->personality != PER_LINUX)
audit_log_format(ab, " per=%lx", context->personality); audit_log_format(ab, " per=%lx", context->personality);
if (context->return_valid) if (context->return_valid != AUDITSC_INVALID)
audit_log_format(ab, " success=%s exit=%ld", audit_log_format(ab, " success=%s exit=%ld",
(context->return_valid==AUDITSC_SUCCESS)?"yes":"no", (context->return_valid==AUDITSC_SUCCESS)?"yes":"no",
context->return_code); context->return_code);
...@@ -1625,7 +1624,7 @@ void __audit_free(struct task_struct *tsk) ...@@ -1625,7 +1624,7 @@ void __audit_free(struct task_struct *tsk)
* need to log via audit_log_exit(). * need to log via audit_log_exit().
*/ */
if (tsk == current && !context->dummy && context->in_syscall) { if (tsk == current && !context->dummy && context->in_syscall) {
context->return_valid = 0; context->return_valid = AUDITSC_INVALID;
context->return_code = 0; context->return_code = 0;
audit_filter_syscall(tsk, context, audit_filter_syscall(tsk, context,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment