Commit c2adb187 authored by Wyes Karny's avatar Wyes Karny Committed by Shuah Khan

cpupower: Make TSC read per CPU for Mperf monitor

System-wide TSC read could cause a drift in C0 percentage calculation.
Because if first TSC is read and then one by one mperf is read for all
cpus, this introduces drift between mperf reading of later CPUs and TSC
reading.  To lower this drift read TSC per CPU and also just after mperf
read.  This technique improves C0 percentage calculation in Mperf monitor.

Before fix: (System 100% busy)

              | Mperf              || RAPL        || Idle_Stats
 PKG|CORE| CPU| C0   | Cx   | Freq  || pack | core  || POLL | C1   | C2
   0|   0|   0| 87.15| 12.85|  2695||168659003|3970468||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   0| 256| 84.62| 15.38|  2695||168659003|3970468||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   1|   1| 87.15| 12.85|  2695||168659003|3970468||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   1| 257| 84.08| 15.92|  2695||168659003|3970468||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   2|   2| 86.61| 13.39|  2695||168659003|3970468||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   2| 258| 83.26| 16.74|  2695||168659003|3970468||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   3|   3| 86.61| 13.39|  2695||168659003|3970468||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   3| 259| 83.60| 16.40|  2695||168659003|3970468||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   4|   4| 86.33| 13.67|  2695||168659003|3970468||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   4| 260| 83.33| 16.67|  2695||168659003|3970468||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   5|   5| 86.06| 13.94|  2695||168659003|3970468||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   5| 261| 83.05| 16.95|  2695||168659003|3970468||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   6|   6| 85.51| 14.49|  2695||168659003|3970468||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00

After fix: (System 100% busy)

             | Mperf              || RAPL        || Idle_Stats
 PKG|CORE| CPU| C0   | Cx   | Freq  || pack | core  || POLL | C1   | C2
   0|   0|   0| 98.03|  1.97|  2415||163295480|3811189||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   0| 256| 98.50|  1.50|  2394||163295480|3811189||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   1|   1| 99.99|  0.01|  2401||163295480|3811189||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   1| 257| 99.99|  0.01|  2375||163295480|3811189||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   2|   2| 99.99|  0.01|  2401||163295480|3811189||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   2| 258|100.00|  0.00|  2401||163295480|3811189||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   3|   3|100.00|  0.00|  2401||163295480|3811189||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   3| 259| 99.99|  0.01|  2435||163295480|3811189||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   4|   4|100.00|  0.00|  2401||163295480|3811189||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   4| 260|100.00|  0.00|  2435||163295480|3811189||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   5|   5| 99.99|  0.01|  2401||163295480|3811189||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   5| 261|100.00|  0.00|  2435||163295480|3811189||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   6|   6|100.00|  0.00|  2401||163295480|3811189||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00
   0|   6| 262|100.00|  0.00|  2435||163295480|3811189||  0.00|  0.00| 0.00

Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>

Fixes: 7fe2f639 ("cpupowerutils - cpufrequtils extended with quite some features")
Signed-off-by: default avatarWyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarShuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
parent e652be0f
......@@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ static int max_freq_mode;
*/
static unsigned long max_frequency;
static unsigned long long tsc_at_measure_start;
static unsigned long long tsc_at_measure_end;
static unsigned long long *tsc_at_measure_start;
static unsigned long long *tsc_at_measure_end;
static unsigned long long *mperf_previous_count;
static unsigned long long *aperf_previous_count;
static unsigned long long *mperf_current_count;
......@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static int mperf_get_count_percent(unsigned int id, double *percent,
aperf_diff = aperf_current_count[cpu] - aperf_previous_count[cpu];
if (max_freq_mode == MAX_FREQ_TSC_REF) {
tsc_diff = tsc_at_measure_end - tsc_at_measure_start;
tsc_diff = tsc_at_measure_end[cpu] - tsc_at_measure_start[cpu];
*percent = 100.0 * mperf_diff / tsc_diff;
dprint("%s: TSC Ref - mperf_diff: %llu, tsc_diff: %llu\n",
mperf_cstates[id].name, mperf_diff, tsc_diff);
......@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ static int mperf_get_count_freq(unsigned int id, unsigned long long *count,
if (max_freq_mode == MAX_FREQ_TSC_REF) {
/* Calculate max_freq from TSC count */
tsc_diff = tsc_at_measure_end - tsc_at_measure_start;
tsc_diff = tsc_at_measure_end[cpu] - tsc_at_measure_start[cpu];
time_diff = timespec_diff_us(time_start, time_end);
max_frequency = tsc_diff / time_diff;
}
......@@ -225,33 +225,27 @@ static int mperf_get_count_freq(unsigned int id, unsigned long long *count,
static int mperf_start(void)
{
int cpu;
unsigned long long dbg;
clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &time_start);
mperf_get_tsc(&tsc_at_measure_start);
for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpu_count; cpu++)
for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpu_count; cpu++) {
mperf_get_tsc(&tsc_at_measure_start[cpu]);
mperf_init_stats(cpu);
}
mperf_get_tsc(&dbg);
dprint("TSC diff: %llu\n", dbg - tsc_at_measure_start);
return 0;
}
static int mperf_stop(void)
{
unsigned long long dbg;
int cpu;
for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpu_count; cpu++)
for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpu_count; cpu++) {
mperf_measure_stats(cpu);
mperf_get_tsc(&tsc_at_measure_end[cpu]);
}
mperf_get_tsc(&tsc_at_measure_end);
clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &time_end);
mperf_get_tsc(&dbg);
dprint("TSC diff: %llu\n", dbg - tsc_at_measure_end);
return 0;
}
......@@ -353,7 +347,8 @@ struct cpuidle_monitor *mperf_register(void)
aperf_previous_count = calloc(cpu_count, sizeof(unsigned long long));
mperf_current_count = calloc(cpu_count, sizeof(unsigned long long));
aperf_current_count = calloc(cpu_count, sizeof(unsigned long long));
tsc_at_measure_start = calloc(cpu_count, sizeof(unsigned long long));
tsc_at_measure_end = calloc(cpu_count, sizeof(unsigned long long));
mperf_monitor.name_len = strlen(mperf_monitor.name);
return &mperf_monitor;
}
......@@ -364,6 +359,8 @@ void mperf_unregister(void)
free(aperf_previous_count);
free(mperf_current_count);
free(aperf_current_count);
free(tsc_at_measure_start);
free(tsc_at_measure_end);
free(is_valid);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment