Commit c55fa3cc authored by Francois Romieu's avatar Francois Romieu Committed by David S. Miller

atm: remove an unnecessary loop

Andrey reported this kernel warning:

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 4114 at kernel/sched/core.c:7737 __might_sleep+0x149/0x1a0
do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at
[<ffffffff813fcb22>] prepare_to_wait+0x182/0x530

The deeply nested alloc_skb is a problem.

Diagnosis: nesting is wrong. It makes zero sense. Fix it and the
implicit task state change problem automagically goes away.

alloc_skb() does not need to be in the "while" loop.

alloc_skb() does not need to be in the {prepare_to_wait/add_wait_queue ...
finish_wait/remove_wait_queue} block.

I claim that:
- alloc_tx() should only perform the "wait_for_decent_tx_drain" part
- alloc_skb() ought to be done directly in vcc_sendmsg
- alloc_skb() failure can be handled gracefully in vcc_sendmsg
- alloc_skb() may use a (m->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT) dependent
  GFP_{KERNEL / ATOMIC} flag
Reported-by: default avatarAndrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: default avatarChas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent be086e7c
...@@ -62,21 +62,16 @@ static void vcc_remove_socket(struct sock *sk) ...@@ -62,21 +62,16 @@ static void vcc_remove_socket(struct sock *sk)
write_unlock_irq(&vcc_sklist_lock); write_unlock_irq(&vcc_sklist_lock);
} }
static struct sk_buff *alloc_tx(struct atm_vcc *vcc, unsigned int size) static bool vcc_tx_ready(struct atm_vcc *vcc, unsigned int size)
{ {
struct sk_buff *skb;
struct sock *sk = sk_atm(vcc); struct sock *sk = sk_atm(vcc);
if (sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk) && !atm_may_send(vcc, size)) { if (sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk) && !atm_may_send(vcc, size)) {
pr_debug("Sorry: wmem_alloc = %d, size = %d, sndbuf = %d\n", pr_debug("Sorry: wmem_alloc = %d, size = %d, sndbuf = %d\n",
sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk), size, sk->sk_sndbuf); sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk), size, sk->sk_sndbuf);
return NULL; return false;
} }
while (!(skb = alloc_skb(size, GFP_KERNEL))) return true;
schedule();
pr_debug("%d += %d\n", sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk), skb->truesize);
atomic_add(skb->truesize, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
return skb;
} }
static void vcc_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk) static void vcc_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
...@@ -606,7 +601,7 @@ int vcc_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t size) ...@@ -606,7 +601,7 @@ int vcc_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t size)
eff = (size+3) & ~3; /* align to word boundary */ eff = (size+3) & ~3; /* align to word boundary */
prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
error = 0; error = 0;
while (!(skb = alloc_tx(vcc, eff))) { while (!vcc_tx_ready(vcc, eff)) {
if (m->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT) { if (m->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT) {
error = -EAGAIN; error = -EAGAIN;
break; break;
...@@ -628,6 +623,15 @@ int vcc_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t size) ...@@ -628,6 +623,15 @@ int vcc_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t size)
finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait); finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
if (error) if (error)
goto out; goto out;
skb = alloc_skb(eff, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!skb) {
error = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
pr_debug("%d += %d\n", sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk), skb->truesize);
atomic_add(skb->truesize, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
skb->dev = NULL; /* for paths shared with net_device interfaces */ skb->dev = NULL; /* for paths shared with net_device interfaces */
ATM_SKB(skb)->atm_options = vcc->atm_options; ATM_SKB(skb)->atm_options = vcc->atm_options;
if (!copy_from_iter_full(skb_put(skb, size), size, &m->msg_iter)) { if (!copy_from_iter_full(skb_put(skb, size), size, &m->msg_iter)) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment