io_uring: add support for ring mapped supplied buffers
Provided buffers allow an application to supply io_uring with buffers that can then be grabbed for a read/receive request, when the data source is ready to deliver data. The existing scheme relies on using IORING_OP_PROVIDE_BUFFERS to do that, but it can be difficult to use in real world applications. It's pretty efficient if the application is able to supply back batches of provided buffers when they have been consumed and the application is ready to recycle them, but if fragmentation occurs in the buffer space, it can become difficult to supply enough buffers at the time. This hurts efficiency. Add a register op, IORING_REGISTER_PBUF_RING, which allows an application to setup a shared queue for each buffer group of provided buffers. The application can then supply buffers simply by adding them to this ring, and the kernel can consume then just as easily. The ring shares the head with the application, the tail remains private in the kernel. Provided buffers setup with IORING_REGISTER_PBUF_RING cannot use IORING_OP_{PROVIDE,REMOVE}_BUFFERS for adding or removing entries to the ring, they must use the mapped ring. Mapped provided buffer rings can co-exist with normal provided buffers, just not within the same group ID. To gauge overhead of the existing scheme and evaluate the mapped ring approach, a simple NOP benchmark was written. It uses a ring of 128 entries, and submits/completes 32 at the time. 'Replenish' is how many buffers are provided back at the time after they have been consumed: Test Replenish NOPs/sec ================================================================ No provided buffers NA ~30M Provided buffers 32 ~16M Provided buffers 1 ~10M Ring buffers 32 ~27M Ring buffers 1 ~27M The ring mapped buffers perform almost as well as not using provided buffers at all, and they don't care if you provided 1 or more back at the same time. This means application can just replenish as they go, rather than need to batch and compact, further reducing overhead in the application. The NOP benchmark above doesn't need to do any compaction, so that overhead isn't even reflected in the above test. Co-developed-by: Dylan Yudaken <dylany@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Showing
This diff is collapsed.
Please register or sign in to comment