Commit cc7a486c authored by Nick Piggin's avatar Nick Piggin Committed by Ingo Molnar

generic-ipi: fix stack and rcu interaction bug in smp_call_function_mask()

* Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> wrote:

> Found a OOPS on a big SMP box during an overnight reboot test with
> upstream git.
>
> Suresh and I looked at the oops and looks like the root cause is in
> generic_smp_call_function_interrupt() and smp_call_function_mask() with
> wait parameter.
>
> The actual oops looked like
>
> [   11.277260] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff8802ffffffff
> [   11.277815] IP: [<ffff8802ffffffff>] 0xffff8802ffffffff
> [   11.278155] PGD 202063 PUD 0
> [   11.278576] Oops: 0010 [1] SMP
> [   11.279006] CPU 5
> [   11.279336] Modules linked in:
> [   11.279752] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27-rc2-00020-g685d87f7 #290
> [   11.280039] RIP: 0010:[<ffff8802ffffffff>]  [<ffff8802ffffffff>] 0xffff8802ffffffff
> [   11.280692] RSP: 0018:ffff88027f1f7f70  EFLAGS: 00010086
> [   11.280976] RAX: 00000000ffffffff RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [   11.281264] RDX: 0000000000004f4e RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000
> [   11.281624] RBP: ffff88027f1f7f98 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffffff802509af
> [   11.281925] R10: ffff8800280c2780 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88027f097d48
> [   11.282214] R13: ffff88027f097d70 R14: 0000000000000005 R15: ffff88027e571000
> [   11.282502] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88027f1c3340(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [   11.283096] CS:  0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
> [   11.283382] CR2: ffff8802ffffffff CR3: 0000000000201000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> [   11.283760] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> [   11.284048] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> [   11.284337] Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo ffff88027f1f2000, task ffff88027f1f0640)
> [   11.284936] Stack:  ffffffff80250963 0000000000000212 0000000000ee8c78 0000000000ee8a66
> [   11.285802]  ffff88027e571550 ffff88027f1f7fa8 ffffffff8021adb5 ffff88027f1f3e40
> [   11.286599]  ffffffff8020bdd6 ffff88027f1f3e40 <EOI>  ffff88027f1f3ef8 0000000000000000
> [   11.287120] Call Trace:
> [   11.287768]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff80250963>] ? generic_smp_call_function_interrupt+0x61/0x12c
> [   11.288354]  [<ffffffff8021adb5>] smp_call_function_interrupt+0x17/0x27
> [   11.288744]  [<ffffffff8020bdd6>] call_function_interrupt+0x66/0x70
> [   11.289030]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff8024ab3b>] ? clockevents_notify+0x19/0x73
> [   11.289380]  [<ffffffff803b9b75>] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple+0x18b/0x1fa
> [   11.289760]  [<ffffffff803b9b6b>] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple+0x181/0x1fa
> [   11.290051]  [<ffffffff8053aeca>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0x70/0xa2
> [   11.290338]  [<ffffffff80209f61>] ? cpu_idle+0x5f/0x7d
> [   11.290723]  [<ffffffff8060224a>] ? start_secondary+0x14d/0x152
> [   11.291010]
> [   11.291287]
> [   11.291654] Code:  Bad RIP value.
> [   11.292041] RIP  [<ffff8802ffffffff>] 0xffff8802ffffffff
> [   11.292380]  RSP <ffff88027f1f7f70>
> [   11.292741] CR2: ffff8802ffffffff
> [   11.310951] ---[ end trace 137c54d525305f1c ]---
>
> The problem is with the following sequence of events:
>
> - CPU A calls smp_call_function_mask() for CPU B with wait parameter
> - CPU A sets up the call_function_data on the stack and does an rcu add to
>   call_function_queue
> - CPU A waits until the WAIT flag is cleared
> - CPU B gets the call function interrupt and starts going through the
>   call_function_queue
> - CPU C also gets some other call function interrupt and starts going through
>   the call_function_queue
> - CPU C, which is also going through the call_function_queue, starts referencing
>   CPU A's stack, as that element is still in call_function_queue
> - CPU B finishes the function call that CPU A set up and as there are no other
>   references to it, rcu deletes the call_function_data (which was from CPU A
>   stack)
> - CPU B sees the wait flag and just clears the flag (no call_rcu to free)
> - CPU A which was waiting on the flag continues executing and the stack
>   contents change
>
> - CPU C is still in rcu_read section accessing the CPU A's stack sees
>   inconsistent call_funation_data and can try to execute
>   function with some random pointer, causing stack corruption for A
>   (by clearing the bits in mask field) and oops.

Nice debugging work.

I'd suggest something like the attached (boot tested) patch as the simple
fix for now.

I expect the benefits from the less synchronized, multiple-in-flight-data
global queue will still outweigh the costs of dynamic allocations. But
if worst comes to worst then we just go back to a globally synchronous
one-at-a-time implementation, but that would be pretty sad!
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 796aadeb
...@@ -260,6 +260,41 @@ void __smp_call_function_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *data) ...@@ -260,6 +260,41 @@ void __smp_call_function_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *data)
generic_exec_single(cpu, data); generic_exec_single(cpu, data);
} }
/* Dummy function */
static void quiesce_dummy(void *unused)
{
}
/*
* Ensure stack based data used in call function mask is safe to free.
*
* This is needed by smp_call_function_mask when using on-stack data, because
* a single call function queue is shared by all CPUs, and any CPU may pick up
* the data item on the queue at any time before it is deleted. So we need to
* ensure that all CPUs have transitioned through a quiescent state after
* this call.
*
* This is a very slow function, implemented by sending synchronous IPIs to
* all possible CPUs. For this reason, we have to alloc data rather than use
* stack based data even in the case of synchronous calls. The stack based
* data is then just used for deadlock/oom fallback which will be very rare.
*
* If a faster scheme can be made, we could go back to preferring stack based
* data -- the data allocation/free is non-zero cost.
*/
static void smp_call_function_mask_quiesce_stack(cpumask_t mask)
{
struct call_single_data data;
int cpu;
data.func = quiesce_dummy;
data.info = NULL;
data.flags = CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask)
generic_exec_single(cpu, &data);
}
/** /**
* smp_call_function_mask(): Run a function on a set of other CPUs. * smp_call_function_mask(): Run a function on a set of other CPUs.
* @mask: The set of cpus to run on. * @mask: The set of cpus to run on.
...@@ -285,6 +320,7 @@ int smp_call_function_mask(cpumask_t mask, void (*func)(void *), void *info, ...@@ -285,6 +320,7 @@ int smp_call_function_mask(cpumask_t mask, void (*func)(void *), void *info,
cpumask_t allbutself; cpumask_t allbutself;
unsigned long flags; unsigned long flags;
int cpu, num_cpus; int cpu, num_cpus;
int slowpath = 0;
/* Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled */ /* Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled */
WARN_ON(irqs_disabled()); WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
...@@ -306,15 +342,16 @@ int smp_call_function_mask(cpumask_t mask, void (*func)(void *), void *info, ...@@ -306,15 +342,16 @@ int smp_call_function_mask(cpumask_t mask, void (*func)(void *), void *info,
return smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, wait); return smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, wait);
} }
if (!wait) {
data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC); data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (data) if (data) {
data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_ALLOC; data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_ALLOC;
} if (wait)
if (!data) { data->csd.flags |= CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
} else {
data = &d; data = &d;
data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_WAIT; data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
wait = 1; wait = 1;
slowpath = 1;
} }
spin_lock_init(&data->lock); spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
...@@ -331,8 +368,11 @@ int smp_call_function_mask(cpumask_t mask, void (*func)(void *), void *info, ...@@ -331,8 +368,11 @@ int smp_call_function_mask(cpumask_t mask, void (*func)(void *), void *info,
arch_send_call_function_ipi(mask); arch_send_call_function_ipi(mask);
/* optionally wait for the CPUs to complete */ /* optionally wait for the CPUs to complete */
if (wait) if (wait) {
csd_flag_wait(&data->csd); csd_flag_wait(&data->csd);
if (unlikely(slowpath))
smp_call_function_mask_quiesce_stack(allbutself);
}
return 0; return 0;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment