Commit cc870a42 authored by Sahitya Tummala's avatar Sahitya Tummala Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

f2fs: do not use mutex lock in atomic context

[ Upstream commit 9083977d ]

Fix below warning coming because of using mutex lock in atomic context.

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:98
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 585, name: sh
Preemption disabled at: __radix_tree_preload+0x28/0x130
Call trace:
 dump_backtrace+0x0/0x2b4
 show_stack+0x20/0x28
 dump_stack+0xa8/0xe0
 ___might_sleep+0x144/0x194
 __might_sleep+0x58/0x8c
 mutex_lock+0x2c/0x48
 f2fs_trace_pid+0x88/0x14c
 f2fs_set_node_page_dirty+0xd0/0x184

Do not use f2fs_radix_tree_insert() to avoid doing cond_resched() with
spin_lock() acquired.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
parent 8bfb5560
......@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ void f2fs_trace_pid(struct page *page)
set_page_private(page, (unsigned long)pid);
retry:
if (radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS))
return;
......@@ -71,7 +72,12 @@ void f2fs_trace_pid(struct page *page)
if (p)
radix_tree_delete(&pids, pid);
f2fs_radix_tree_insert(&pids, pid, current);
if (radix_tree_insert(&pids, pid, current)) {
spin_unlock(&pids_lock);
radix_tree_preload_end();
cond_resched();
goto retry;
}
trace_printk("%3x:%3x %4x %-16s\n",
MAJOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev), MINOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev),
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment