Commit d5b0e067 authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra

u64_stats,lockdep: Fix u64_stats_init() vs lockdep

Jakub reported that:

    static struct net_device *rtl8139_init_board(struct pci_dev *pdev)
    {
	    ...
	    u64_stats_init(&tp->rx_stats.syncp);
	    u64_stats_init(&tp->tx_stats.syncp);
	    ...
    }

results in lockdep getting confused between the RX and TX stats lock.
This is because u64_stats_init() is an inline calling seqcount_init(),
which is a macro using a static variable to generate a lockdep class.

By wrapping that in an inline, we negate the effect of the macro and
fold the static key variable, hence the confusion.

Fix by also making u64_stats_init() a macro for the case where it
matters, leaving the other case an inline for argument validation
etc.
Reported-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Debugged-by: default avatar"Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: default avatar"Erhard F." <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YEXicy6+9MksdLZh@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
parent 50bf8080
......@@ -115,12 +115,13 @@ static inline void u64_stats_inc(u64_stats_t *p)
}
#endif
#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32 && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
#define u64_stats_init(syncp) seqcount_init(&(syncp)->seq)
#else
static inline void u64_stats_init(struct u64_stats_sync *syncp)
{
#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32 && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
seqcount_init(&syncp->seq);
#endif
}
#endif
static inline void u64_stats_update_begin(struct u64_stats_sync *syncp)
{
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment