Commit e2115134 authored by Daniel Borkmann's avatar Daniel Borkmann Committed by Sasha Levin

netfilter: nf_conntrack_dccp: fix skb_header_pointer API usages

Some occurences in the netfilter tree use skb_header_pointer() in
the following way ...

  struct dccp_hdr _dh, *dh;
  ...
  skb_header_pointer(skb, dataoff, sizeof(_dh), &dh);

... where dh itself is a pointer that is being passed as the copy
buffer. Instead, we need to use &_dh as the forth argument so that
we're copying the data into an actual buffer that sits on the stack.

Currently, we probably could overwrite memory on the stack (e.g.
with a possibly mal-formed DCCP packet), but unintentionally, as
we only want the buffer to be placed into _dh variable.

Fixes: 2bc78049 ("[NETFILTER]: nf_conntrack: add DCCP protocol support")
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>

(cherry picked from commit b22f5126)
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
parent 8a14c351
......@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static bool dccp_new(struct nf_conn *ct, const struct sk_buff *skb,
const char *msg;
u_int8_t state;
dh = skb_header_pointer(skb, dataoff, sizeof(_dh), &dh);
dh = skb_header_pointer(skb, dataoff, sizeof(_dh), &_dh);
BUG_ON(dh == NULL);
state = dccp_state_table[CT_DCCP_ROLE_CLIENT][dh->dccph_type][CT_DCCP_NONE];
......@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static int dccp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct, const struct sk_buff *skb,
u_int8_t type, old_state, new_state;
enum ct_dccp_roles role;
dh = skb_header_pointer(skb, dataoff, sizeof(_dh), &dh);
dh = skb_header_pointer(skb, dataoff, sizeof(_dh), &_dh);
BUG_ON(dh == NULL);
type = dh->dccph_type;
......@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ static int dccp_error(struct net *net, struct nf_conn *tmpl,
unsigned int cscov;
const char *msg;
dh = skb_header_pointer(skb, dataoff, sizeof(_dh), &dh);
dh = skb_header_pointer(skb, dataoff, sizeof(_dh), &_dh);
if (dh == NULL) {
msg = "nf_ct_dccp: short packet ";
goto out_invalid;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment