Commit e5e678e4 authored by Rik van Riel's avatar Rik van Riel Committed by Peter Zijlstra

sched,fair: Skip newidle_balance if a wakeup is pending

The try_to_wake_up function has an optimization where it can queue
a task for wakeup on its previous CPU, if the task is still in the
middle of going to sleep inside schedule().

Once schedule() re-enables IRQs, the task will be woken up with an
IPI, and placed back on the runqueue.

If we have such a wakeup pending, there is no need to search other
CPUs for runnable tasks. Just skip (or bail out early from) newidle
balancing, and run the just woken up task.

For a memcache like workload test, this reduces total CPU use by
about 2%, proportionally split between user and system time,
and p99 and p95 application response time by 10% on average.
The schedstats run_delay number shows a similar improvement.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Acked-by: default avatarMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422130236.0bb353df@imladris.surriel.com
parent 2b8ca1a9
......@@ -10592,6 +10592,14 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
u64 curr_cost = 0;
update_misfit_status(NULL, this_rq);
/*
* There is a task waiting to run. No need to search for one.
* Return 0; the task will be enqueued when switching to idle.
*/
if (this_rq->ttwu_pending)
return 0;
/*
* We must set idle_stamp _before_ calling idle_balance(), such that we
* measure the duration of idle_balance() as idle time.
......@@ -10657,7 +10665,8 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
* Stop searching for tasks to pull if there are
* now runnable tasks on this rq.
*/
if (pulled_task || this_rq->nr_running > 0)
if (pulled_task || this_rq->nr_running > 0 ||
this_rq->ttwu_pending)
break;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment