Commit e6a087ee authored by Bjorn Helgaas's avatar Bjorn Helgaas

PCI: qcom: Remove redundant struct qcom_pcie.dev

Remove the struct qcom_pcie.dev member, which is a duplicate of the generic
pp.dev member.  No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
parent 0edd578e
......@@ -87,7 +87,6 @@ struct qcom_pcie_ops {
struct qcom_pcie {
struct pcie_port pp;
struct device *dev;
union qcom_pcie_resources res;
void __iomem *parf;
void __iomem *elbi;
......@@ -135,7 +134,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_establish_link(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_v0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
{
struct qcom_pcie_resources_v0 *res = &pcie->res.v0;
struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
struct device *dev = pcie->pp.dev;
res->vdda = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vdda");
if (IS_ERR(res->vdda))
......@@ -187,7 +186,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_v0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_v1(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
{
struct qcom_pcie_resources_v1 *res = &pcie->res.v1;
struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
struct device *dev = pcie->pp.dev;
res->vdda = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vdda");
if (IS_ERR(res->vdda))
......@@ -236,7 +235,7 @@ static void qcom_pcie_deinit_v0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
static int qcom_pcie_init_v0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
{
struct qcom_pcie_resources_v0 *res = &pcie->res.v0;
struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
struct device *dev = pcie->pp.dev;
u32 val;
int ret;
......@@ -358,7 +357,7 @@ static void qcom_pcie_deinit_v1(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
static int qcom_pcie_init_v1(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
{
struct qcom_pcie_resources_v1 *res = &pcie->res.v1;
struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
struct device *dev = pcie->pp.dev;
int ret;
ret = reset_control_deassert(res->core);
......@@ -510,7 +509,6 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
pp = &pcie->pp;
pcie->ops = (struct qcom_pcie_ops *)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
pcie->dev = dev;
pcie->reset = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "perst", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
if (IS_ERR(pcie->reset))
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment