Commit e8ddcce3 authored by Steffen Maier's avatar Steffen Maier Committed by Stefan Bader

scsi: zfcp: fix missing SCSI trace for retry of abort / scsi_eh TMF

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1784382

commit 81979ae6 upstream.

We already have a SCSI trace for the end of abort and scsi_eh TMF. Due to
zfcp_erp_wait() and fc_block_scsi_eh() time can pass between the start of
our eh callback and an actual send/recv of an abort / TMF request.  In order
to see the temporal sequence including any abort / TMF send retries, add a
trace before the above two blocking functions.  This supports problem
determination with scsi_eh and parallel zfcp ERP.

No need to explicitly trace the beginning of our eh callback, since we
typically can send an abort / TMF and see its HBA response (in the worst
case, it's a pseudo response on dismiss all of adapter recovery, e.g. due to
an FSF request timeout [fsrth_1] of the abort / TMF). If we cannot send, we
now get a trace record for the first "abrt_wt" or "[lt]r_wait" which denotes
almost the beginning of the callback.

No need to explicitly trace the wakeup after the above two blocking
functions because the next retry loop causes another trace in any case and
that is sufficient.

Example trace records formatted with zfcpdbf from s390-tools:

Timestamp      : ...
Area           : SCSI
Subarea        : 00
Level          : 1
Exception      : -
CPU ID         : ..
Caller         : 0x...
Record ID      : 1
Tag            : abrt_wt        abort, before zfcp_erp_wait()
Request ID     : 0x0000000000000000                     none (invalid)
SCSI ID        : 0x<scsi_id>
SCSI LUN       : 0x<scsi_lun>
SCSI LUN high  : 0x<scsi_lun_high>
SCSI result    : 0x<scsi_result_of_cmd_to_be_aborted>
SCSI retries   : 0x<retries_of_cmd_to_be_aborted>
SCSI allowed   : 0x<allowed_retries_of_cmd_to_be_aborted>
SCSI scribble  : 0x<req_id_of_cmd_to_be_aborted>
SCSI opcode    : <CDB_of_cmd_to_be_aborted>
FCP rsp inf cod: 0x..                                   none (invalid)
FCP rsp IU     : ...                                    none (invalid)

Timestamp      : ...
Area           : SCSI
Subarea        : 00
Level          : 1
Exception      : -
CPU ID         : ..
Caller         : 0x...
Record ID      : 1
Tag            : lr_wait        LUN reset, before zfcp_erp_wait()
Request ID     : 0x0000000000000000                     none (invalid)
SCSI ID        : 0x<scsi_id>
SCSI LUN       : 0x<scsi_lun>
SCSI LUN high  : 0x<scsi_lun_high>
SCSI result    : 0x...                                  unrelated
SCSI retries   : 0x..                                   unrelated
SCSI allowed   : 0x..                                   unrelated
SCSI scribble  : 0x...                                  unrelated
SCSI opcode    : ...                                    unrelated
FCP rsp inf cod: 0x..                                   none (invalid)
FCP rsp IU     : ...                                    none (invalid)
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com>
Fixes: 63caf367 ("[SCSI] zfcp: Improve reliability of SCSI eh handlers in zfcp")
Fixes: af4de36d ("[SCSI] zfcp: Block scsi_eh thread for rport state BLOCKED")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #2.6.38+
Reviewed-by: default avatarBenjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKhalid Elmously <khalid.elmously@canonical.com>
parent 2d96fe06
......@@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ static int zfcp_scsi_eh_abort_handler(struct scsi_cmnd *scpnt)
if (abrt_req)
break;
zfcp_dbf_scsi_abort("abrt_wt", scpnt, NULL);
zfcp_erp_wait(adapter);
ret = fc_block_scsi_eh(scpnt);
if (ret) {
......@@ -276,6 +277,7 @@ static int zfcp_task_mgmt_function(struct scsi_cmnd *scpnt, u8 tm_flags)
if (fsf_req)
break;
zfcp_dbf_scsi_devreset("wait", scpnt, tm_flags, NULL);
zfcp_erp_wait(adapter);
ret = fc_block_scsi_eh(scpnt);
if (ret) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment