Commit ee5f80a9 authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner Committed by Thomas Gleixner

irq: call __irq_enter() before calling the tick_idle_check

Impact: avoid spurious ksoftirqd wakeups

The tick idle check which is called from irq_enter() was run before
the call to __irq_enter() which did not set the in_interrupt() bits in
preempt_count. That way the raise of a softirq woke up softirqd for
nothing as the softirq was handled on return from interrupt.

Call __irq_enter() before calling into the tick idle check code.
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 5ceb1a04
...@@ -269,9 +269,10 @@ void irq_enter(void) ...@@ -269,9 +269,10 @@ void irq_enter(void)
{ {
int cpu = smp_processor_id(); int cpu = smp_processor_id();
if (idle_cpu(cpu) && !in_interrupt()) if (idle_cpu(cpu) && !in_interrupt()) {
__irq_enter();
tick_check_idle(cpu); tick_check_idle(cpu);
} else
__irq_enter(); __irq_enter();
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment