Commit f0744af7 authored by Oleg Nesterov's avatar Oleg Nesterov

uprobes: Kill the pointless inode/uc checks in register/unregister

register/unregister verifies that inode/uc != NULL. For what?
This really looks like "hide the potential problem", the caller
should pass the valid data.

register() also checks uc->next == NULL, probably to prevent the
double-register but the caller can do other stupid/wrong things.
If we do this check, then we should document that uc->next should
be cleared before register() and add BUG_ON().

Also add the small comment about the i_size_read() check.
Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
parent bbc33d05
...@@ -844,9 +844,7 @@ int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer * ...@@ -844,9 +844,7 @@ int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *
struct uprobe *uprobe; struct uprobe *uprobe;
int ret; int ret;
if (!inode || !uc || uc->next) /* Racy, just to catch the obvious mistakes */
return -EINVAL;
if (offset > i_size_read(inode)) if (offset > i_size_read(inode))
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;
...@@ -883,9 +881,6 @@ void uprobe_unregister(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consume ...@@ -883,9 +881,6 @@ void uprobe_unregister(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consume
{ {
struct uprobe *uprobe; struct uprobe *uprobe;
if (!inode || !uc)
return;
uprobe = find_uprobe(inode, offset); uprobe = find_uprobe(inode, offset);
if (!uprobe) if (!uprobe)
return; return;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment